Edited by Claire A. Hill and Steven Davidoff Solomon
Chapter 11: The role of judicial opinions in shaping M & A practice
AbstractThis chapter reviews multiple ways in which judicial opinions in Delaware litigation involving mergers and acquisitions have influenced the process and content of such transactions. The courts achieve this influence by characterizing conduct as salutary or problematic, by validating or invalidating elements of transactions, and by providing interpretations of the agreements governing those transactions. As illustrations, this chapter reviews the impact of judicial opinions on use of fairness opinions, drafting of material adverse change (‘MAC’) clauses, the demise of two-tier tender offers, the emergence of poison pills, the use of special committees, the scope and content of deal protection measures, and disclosure of investment banker conflicts of interest.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.