Show Less
You do not have access to this content

Property, Labour and Legal Regulation

Dignity or Dependence?

Mark Findlay

In this revealing comparative study, Mark Findlay examines the problematic nexus between undervalued labour and vulnerable migration status in dis-embedded markets. It highlights the frustrations raised by timeless regulatory failure and the chronic complicity of private property arrangements in delivering unsustainable market engagement. Mark Findlay identifies the challenge for normative and functional foundations of equitable governance, by repositioning regulatory principle, to restore dignity to market relations.
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Substantive inequality to contract?

Mark Findlay


Normally, like planets circling a star, political philosophy and the law of contracts affect each other’s path without their orbits ever coinciding.1

Contracting is the making and keeping of promises. The images of contract as a relationship of liberty and social mutualisation, discussed in Chapter 3, rely on contracting serving two ideal functions in providing a guarantee of: a) equivalent exchange, and b) liberty, since contractual relations are voluntary and free from coercion. In such a setting of mutuality (legalised or otherwise), contract characterises a new form of social sustainability. Almost mystically, justice is conceived in contractual bonding as reflected through equal liberty to contract and the shared and consensual adoption of individualised obligations.

The common law principles of contract law represent similar contextual and functional arrangements. In searching for the core elements of contracting principle it is easy to be distracted by the proliferation of commentary which deems principle to be process. The normative foundations for contracting are what should explain the essential steps in the process which keep it in line with this central principle. The governing intent behind contracting is that people should only be bound to promises which they entered into having the capacity to consent, the knowledge of what it is they are consenting to and that their consent is actual and not unjustly procured.

This chapter has two clear intentions. First will be the exploration of the dissonance between contracting principle and the practice of contract...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.