Legal Services Regulation at the Crossroads
Show Less

Legal Services Regulation at the Crossroads

Justitia’s Legions

Noel Semple

Through a comparative study of English-speaking jurisdictions, this book seeks to illuminate the policy choices involved in legal services regulation as well as the important consequences of those choices. Regulation can protect the interests of clients and the public, and reinforce the rule of law. On the other hand, legal services regulation can also undermine access to justice and suppress innovation, while failing to accomplish any of its lofty ambitions. The book seeks a path forward to increasing regulation's benefits and reducing its burdens for clients and for the public. It proposes a client-centric approach to enhance access to justice and service quality, while revitalizing legal professionalism, self-regulation, and independence.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Regulatory failure

Noel Semple


Regulation fails when it does not achieve the goals which justified its creation. Advancing the interests of the clients of legal service practitioners is perhaps the most important stated goal of legal services regulators. This chapter will argue that core commitments of the professionalist-independent tradition make it difficult for North American regulators to achieve this goal. There are three essential problems. First, the commitment to imposing a single regulatory regime on all lawyers makes it difficult for regulators to advance the interests of all clients in an era of enormously heterogeneous practice environments. Second, the professionalist-independent tradition's single-minded focus on individual lawyers as ethical agents disregards the powerful influence of ethical infrastructure, or the lack thereof, within firms. Third, self-regulatory governance makes it difficult for regulators to focus on and prioritize the interests of clients when they conflict with those of lawyers. This chapter will consider these three problems in turn. It concludes that while they are not fatal to the professionalist-independent project they do require concerted and creative reforms. The first distinguishing feature of professionalist-independent regulation identified in Chapter 3 is the establishment of a single legal profession, all of whose members are subject to a single regulatory regime. David Wilkins identifies the sense of being a ‘single profession bound together by unique and specialized norms and practices’ as ‘one of the legal profession's most important constitutive beliefs’ in the United States.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.