Legal Services Regulation at the Crossroads
Show Less

Legal Services Regulation at the Crossroads

Justitia’s Legions

Noel Semple

Through a comparative study of English-speaking jurisdictions, this book seeks to illuminate the policy choices involved in legal services regulation as well as the important consequences of those choices. Regulation can protect the interests of clients and the public, and reinforce the rule of law. On the other hand, legal services regulation can also undermine access to justice and suppress innovation, while failing to accomplish any of its lofty ambitions. The book seeks a path forward to increasing regulation's benefits and reducing its burdens for clients and for the public. It proposes a client-centric approach to enhance access to justice and service quality, while revitalizing legal professionalism, self-regulation, and independence.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Client-centricity in legal services regulation

Noel Semple


This chapter argues that client-centricity should be the overarching goal of legal services regulatory reform in common law North America. Client-centric regulators strive to ensure that clients and would-be clients have access to legal services which are high quality, affordable, variegated, and innovative. Client-centricity means raising regulatory sights beyond traditional goals such as ensuring lawyer competence and ethicality. It means taking responsibility for creating a legal profession and a legal services marketplace which meet the needs of people today. Client-centric regulation also attends closely to the interests of those who would benefit from being clients, but are not now able to be clients. In other words, client-centric regulation fosters access to legal services, and therefore access to justice. Client-centricity, perhaps counter-intuitively, means that regulators must devote more attention to some clients than to others. Large corporate and institutional clients usually have little difficulty securing high quality, affordable, and variegated services by themselves on the open market. By contrast, most clients and would-be clients who are individuals cannot do so by themselves. It is therefore these clients whose interests must be prioritized by regulators. Regulators must strive to protect the interests of all such clients, including those who voice no complaints about their lawyers. Client-centricity is an alternative to the competitive-consumerist agenda which has transformed legal services regulation in Northern Europe and Australasia.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.