Liberty and Equality in Political Economy
Show Less

Liberty and Equality in Political Economy

From Locke versus Rousseau to the Present

  • New Thinking in Political Economy series

Nicholas Capaldi and Gordon Lloyd

Liberty and Equality in Political Economy is an evolutionary account of the ongoing debate between two narratives: Locke and liberty versus Rousseau and equality. Within this book, Nicholas Capaldi and Gordon Lloyd view these authors and their texts as parts of a conversation, therefore highlighting a new perspective on the texts themselves.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 2: Jean Jacques Rousseau and the Three Pillars of Equality

Nicholas Capaldi and Gordon Lloyd

Extract

It is useful to understand Rousseau’s work (1712–1778) as a response primarily to Locke. What Locke and Rousseau share and what makes them defining figures of the modern conversation is the recognition that the modern world was transitioning away from Feudal agrarianism into something economically novel with important social implications (a form of “creative destruction” to use Schumpeter’s phrase). What they also recognized was the existence of a new persona, a new form of self-consciousness. Locke welcomed the new persona, but Rousseau argued that a further transformation was necessary. Rousseau first gained attention and prominence with the publication of the Discourse on the Arts and Sciences (Rousseau 1750) (hereafter the First Discourse). It was in response to an essay contest designed to highlight in a positive way the contributions of science and technology to the advancement of civilization. Rousseau argued against the original purpose of the contest, but still won the prize. He argued that the arts and sciences, and therefore the entire technological project, did not respond to genuine human needs. Rather, the technological project was a reflection of pride and vanity. Rousseau asks whether these arts and sciences have improved human character or the human condition. This puts the Lockean narrative on the defensive. The arts and sciences, according to Rousseau, are motivated by human vices: “Astronomy was born from superstition; eloquence from ambition, hate, flattery, and falsehood; geometry from avarice, physics from vain curiosity; all, even moral philosophy, from human pride” (Rousseau 1986, p._14).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.