These concluding remarks do not constitute a chapter as such. They are simply a résumé of the principal points inherent in the previous chapters and in the separate Elgar publication by the present author, namely A Short Introduction to Judging and to Legal Reasoning (Edward Elgar, 2016), together with some further concluding ideas. There is some discussion of Professor Lasser’s notion of an official and unofficial portrait of French law, a dichotomy employed in the Short Introduction book (but in respect of English legal reasoning). And this is followed by short discussions on the two principal conclusions; these are of course Vaihinger’s ‘as if’ fiction theory (Chapter 9) and the importance of the notion of an interest (Chapters 11–12). Finally, a further conclusion is suggested. This is that legal reasoning, and indeed law as a discipline, is underpinned by a number of epistemological tensions which are implicitly (if not explicitly on occasions) ever present; and it is unlikely that they will ever to be ‘solved’ as such. For these tensions are part of the nature of law as a discipline.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.