How to get Published in the Best Management Journals
Show Less

How to get Published in the Best Management Journals

Edited by Timothy Clark, Mike Wright and David J. Ketchen Jr.

This much-anticipated book is a comprehensive guide to a successful publishing strategy. Written by top journal editors, it introduces the publishing process, resolves practical issues, encourages the right methods and offers tips for navigating the review process, understanding journals and publishing across disciplinary boundaries. As if that weren’t enough it includes key contributions on open access, publishing ethics, making use of peer review, special issues, sustaining a publications career, journal rankings and increasing your odds of publishing success. This will be a must read for anyone seeking to publish in top journals.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: Suggestions for strengthening the discussion section and increasing your odds of publication success

Donald D. Bergh


What section of a paper do you read first? The Introduction? Did you know that many reviewers and editors read the Discussion first? Surprised? Don’t be, as this section is where readers learn about how a paper’s story adds uniquely to knowledge. An effective Discussion will identify the research purpose, the paper’s unique insight, and then provide an elaboration of the contribution’s meaning and implications. If your paper offers a new advance, the reader should find it in the Discussion. If your paper does not offer a new contribution, the reader will find that out too. In many ways, the Discussion section is where the author showcases the paper’s contribution. You want it to be a big bang and not a whimper, which, I’m sorry to say, is usually what happens. Using my experience as a long-term reviewer (20 years or so) and as an associate editor of three top journals for more than 12 years now, I want to share with you that I usually run into big problems when I read the Discussion sections of new manuscripts. These outcomes are disappointing, as authors have usually invested considerable resources in creating an impressive model and data set while reviewers discover that the authors do not leverage the uniqueness about their research to provide a new and meaningful insight. There is good news though. Many problems with contribution can be anticipated and resolved before submission.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.