Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles
Show Less

Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles

Is IP a Lex Specialis?

Edited by Graeme B. Dinwoodie

The rule of lex specialis serves as an interpretative method to determine which of two contesting norms should be used to govern. In this book, the lex specialis label is broadly applied to intellectual property and connects a series of questions: What is the scope of intellectual property law? What is the relationship between intellectual property law and general legal principles? To what extent are intellectual property laws exceptional? Drawn together by leading IP scholar Graeme Dinwoodie, these questions and others are answered carefully and reflectively by a team of expert international contributors.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Compelling disclosure of software interoperability information: A risk for innovation or a balanced solution?

Begoña G. Otero


The first part of this chapter explores how and why certain provisions of the Software Directive influence disclosure of software interoperability information. This inquiry is prompted by Actions 23 and 25 of the Digital Agenda for Europe 2010–2020 (DAE). There, the European Commission (in a study of licensing) proposed a compulsory licence approach as the most suitable way to achieve ex ante disclosure of interoperability information from significant market players in the ICT sector. Additionally, the Study reached two central conclusions: first, interoperability information needs to be treated differently than software generally; and, second, compelling the disclosure of interoperability information, though important for reasons of competitiveness, must also be done with awareness of the broader effects of innovation. As to the former, it has to be recognised that software interoperability information involves a number of strategic choices for players in the ICT sector. This information is embodied in a very specific part of software systems, namely its interfaces. Where to put interfaces and whether to make them “open” or “closed” is a fundamental strategic choice for firms. From the legal perspective, this strategic choice has raised considerable concerns both for the fields of intellectual property rights (IPRs) and competition law. However, approaches differ.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.