Constitutionalism Across Borders in the Struggle Against Terrorism
Show Less

Constitutionalism Across Borders in the Struggle Against Terrorism

Edited by Federico Fabbrini and Vicki C. Jackson

This edited collection explores the topic of constitutionalism across borders in the struggle against terrorism, analyzing how constitutional rules and principles relevant in the field of counter-terrorism move across borders. What emerges is a picture of the complex interplay of constitutional law, international law, criminal law and the law of war, creating webs of norms and regulations that apply in the struggle against terrorism conducted across increasingly porous borders.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: United Nations law: substantive constitutionalism through human rights versus formal hierarchy through Article 103 of the Charter

Martin Scheinin


The purpose of this contribution is to examine the relationship between formal and substantive constitutionalism, the former pertaining to hierarchy and the latter to values, axiology. A number of cases addressing targeted sanctions resulting from terrorist listings by the United Nations Security Council will be discussed to address the question. One of the main claims made in the chapter is that UN law does include human rights norms, and hence an eventual clash between the rights of the individual and the authority of the Security Council is not a conflict between different legal orders but a tension within any legal order, including within UN law. Only by living up to the expectation of comprising both formal and substantive dimensions of constitutionalism, can UN law claim a status as part of a ‘global constitution’. A minimalist definition of a Constitution, inspired by Hans Kelsen, is that it is an aggregate of legal norms that prescribe the rules for the enactment of new legal norms. A Constitution is thus the highest level of the pyramid of enacted legal norms, and the legal basis for the enactment of laws by the national legislature (Parliament), those laws in turn defining the powers to enact lower regulations. This is the core of formal constitutionalism, related to the idea of a strict hierarchy of enacted (posited) legal norms.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.