Constitutionalism Across Borders in the Struggle Against Terrorism
Show Less

Constitutionalism Across Borders in the Struggle Against Terrorism

Edited by Federico Fabbrini and Vicki C. Jackson

This edited collection explores the topic of constitutionalism across borders in the struggle against terrorism, analyzing how constitutional rules and principles relevant in the field of counter-terrorism move across borders. What emerges is a picture of the complex interplay of constitutional law, international law, criminal law and the law of war, creating webs of norms and regulations that apply in the struggle against terrorism conducted across increasingly porous borders.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: Transnational seizures: the constitution and criminal procedure abroad

Jennifer Daskal


The legal analysis justifying the targeted killing of Anwar al-Aulaqi unleashed an important debate – as well as a torrent of criticism – regarding the administration’s understanding of the Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights of a United States (U.S.) citizen-turned-terrorist abroad. But at least the analysis assumed these constitutional provisions applied. The vast majority of terrorism suspects overseas are not citizens, and without sufficient connections to the U.S. that would, under current doctrine, as commonly understood, provide them with any constitutional rights protections. When coupled with the U.S.’s view that key international human rights treaty obligations do not extend extraterritorially, the legal constraints are few – not just with respect to uses of lethal force, but also with respect to the treatment of non-citizens in U.S. custody. In this chapter, I argue that this is substantively and normatively wrong: that Fourth and Fifth Amendment obligations should be triggered whenever the state effectuates a “seizure,” thereby bringing a person under its direct control, or, in the case of a targeted killing, terminating his life. The chapter proceeds in three sections. Section I provides background on the Supreme Court’s conflicting approach to the extension of constitutional rights abroad. Section II argues that seizures of persons ought to trigger the application of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, regardless of the location or identity of person being seized.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.