Groupthink and Denial on a Grand Scale
Chapter 6: The Delors Report
The Delors Committee deliberately excluded the Economics and Finance ministers at the suggestion of Delors himself. He wanted the Committee to ‘consist of the governors of the central banks, who were more independent than the governments’ (Danescu, 2013c: 4). Delors (1989a: 63) noted ‘The creeping paralysis of the Community was the result of the Member States calling into question the Community method for the progressive and limited transfer of national powers to common institutions possessing a real power to make decisions.’ Delors knew that the Bundesbank would not budge at all on the independence of a new European central bank and that it would have been difficult to get agreement if the Ecofin Ministers were involved. Howarth and Loedel (2003: 36) said, ‘National treasury officials from several countries balked at German demands on autonomy and focused a great deal more on the economic side of EMU’. Further, the central bankers had been explicitly excluded from the design of the EMS in 1979, which Delors considered had rendered the system prone to failure. Delors thus constituted his Committee to minimise any (legitimate) discussions of Member State sovereignty and to push through a homogenised Monetarist vision for the new united Europe. By excluding the diversity of opinion, Europe was setting itself up for monumental failure, which manifested in 2008.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.