A Realistic Analysis of the Market Oriented Capitalist Economy
Chapter 5: Why traditional mainstream Keynesian theory is not Keynes’s theory
Long before Keynes developed his general theory to explain why persistent unemployment could occur in the economy, classical theory had explained unemployment as the result of short-term imperfections or monopoly elements on the supply side of the market system. These imperfections took the form of rigidities in the market money wage rate and/or product prices due to noncompetitive labor and product markets. If there was no government interference during these periods of unemployment, then the resulting weakened markets would induce sufficient competition to make wages and prices more flexible in a downward direction and would ultimately weed out the imperfections leaving a stronger, more powerful full employment economy to carry on. In essence, classical theory suggested that unemployment and depressions were merely the working of nature’s law of the jungle. Ultimately, the market would solve the problem by inducing a competitive economic environment that, in Darwinian fashion, would kill off the weak and inefficient, thereby assuring the survival of the fittest. When the economy purged itself of its imperfections, it would generate full employment and prosperity for all the survivors. An example of how this classical economic theory affected government decision making is provided in the autobiography of President Herbert Hoover, who was president of the United States when the Great Depression began in 1929. Hoover indicates that whenever he wanted to take some positive action to end the depression, his Treasury Secretary, Andrew Mellon, always cautioned against government action and gave the same advice.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.