Edited by Sara Drake and Melanie Smith
Chapter 3: The long, but promising, road from deterrence to networked enforcement
AbstractRegulatory enforcement as a practice, and how political scientists, regulatory scholars and lawyers think about it, has changed considerably since the 1980s. For a long time, practitioners and scholars have sought to improve the effectiveness of regulatory enforcement without sacrificing other democratic values such as accountability and transparency. This chapter maps the evolution of regulatory enforcement literature by discussing some of the steps taken on the long, but promising, road that practitioners and scholars have travelled: from deterrence-based strategies to compliance-based strategies, and from enforced self-regulation first to responsive regulation and then on to smart regulation and beyond. The chapter concentrates in particular on the opportunities and constraints of what is the current state-of-the-art practice and theory on regulatory enforcement: networked enforcement. The chapter argues that, whilst scholarship on regulatory enforcement has made some impressive advances, the ‘perfect’ regulatory enforcement model has not yet been uncovered. It concludes by reflecting on some of the key questions that scholars may wish to take up in future research on regulatory enforcement.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.