A Case for Constructive Conceptual Explanation
- Elgar Studies in Legal Theory
Chapter 5: The contingent relation between invalidity and unconstitutionality
AbstractThis chapter provides an illustration of how recognition of contingent relations constitutes a viable alternative and addition to identification of necessary features of law, by engaging in a substantive dispute in analytical jurisprudence. Specifically, this chapter defends a particular – and rather unpopular – descriptive-explanatory theory of law, exclusive legal positivism. The argument turns not on consideration of the authoritative nature of law – as almost all arguments for exclusive positivism do – but rather on identification of the contingent relation between unconstitutionality and invalidity. The account in this chapter also helps to set up the view discussed in subsequent chapters that the best conceptual explanation of some aspect of the social phenomenon of law may require revision to ordinary or folk understandings of that aspect.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.