Madness and Leadership
Show Less

Madness and Leadership

From Antiquity to the New Common Era

Savvas Papacostas

Madness and Leadership studies leaders and followers from social, cultural, and biologic perspectives and explores aspects of their personalities that induce them to assume their respective roles. It proposes that leadership and followership are evolutionary adaptations, developed to enhance survival and group cohesion; that leaders possess certain biologically-derived personality traits which set them apart and alert followers, consciously or unconsciously, of their status. Important factors that enhance leader emergence have been linked through evolution and are constituents of all societies past and present. Within political theories and historical examples, this book carries the discussion on leadership into a new direction by suggesting that mild psychopathology is one of its central components.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Genes, behaviour, and the human speciation event

Savvas Papacostas


It is in our genes to understand the universe if we can, to keep trying even if we cannot, and to be enchanted by the act of learning all the way. Lewis Thomas The question whether human behaviour is genetic (instinctual) having been determined by the principles of evolution through the millennia, or the result of cultural learning, can be approached from two somewhat opposing points of view, even though there are as many shades of answers as people who pondered the subject. Historically, there were those scientists who viewed behaviour as mostly genetically determined and hard-wired into our biological substance; and there were those who upheld the view that it is the product of an active learning process dependent upon upbringing, learning and social practices. The former are known as ethologists whereas the latter as social scientists. Ridley (2003), in a somewhat conciliatory approach, claimed that ‘genes are designed to take their cues from nurture’; he advocated experience (nurture) as the trigger of gene expression (nature) and called the former by such names as nativists, geneticists, hereditarians, or naturians, and the latter as empiricists, environmentalists, or nurturists. He claimed that ‘the more we lift the lid on the genome, the more vulnerable to experience genes appear to be’. As he puts it elsewhere in the same book, ‘nature and nurture are not opposed to each other but work together’.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.