Madness and Leadership
Show Less

Madness and Leadership

From Antiquity to the New Common Era

Savvas Papacostas

Madness and Leadership studies leaders and followers from social, cultural, and biologic perspectives and explores aspects of their personalities that induce them to assume their respective roles. It proposes that leadership and followership are evolutionary adaptations, developed to enhance survival and group cohesion; that leaders possess certain biologically-derived personality traits which set them apart and alert followers, consciously or unconsciously, of their status. Important factors that enhance leader emergence have been linked through evolution and are constituents of all societies past and present. Within political theories and historical examples, this book carries the discussion on leadership into a new direction by suggesting that mild psychopathology is one of its central components.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Society and its leaders

Savvas Papacostas


The voyage of discovery lies not in seeking new horizons, but in seeing with new eyes. Marcel Proust Time and again in this book we dealt with hierarchies and pecking orders in describing social organization. In the animal kingdom, as well as in human groups, there are systems in place that ensure the smooth running of their affairs; to accomplish this, individuals must be ranked according to certain criteria that determine their station in life. It was argued previously that the emergence of leaders and the tendency to form hierarchies is to a large extent genetically preconditioned and is therefore biologically determined. That this is the case in social animals is accepted easily; when we attempt to apply the same way of thinking to humans, however, all bets are off. The nature versus nurture business re-emerges and people have difficulty accepting that their behaviour can be explained better in terms of genetics rather than learning. People intuitively prefer social phenomena to be considered as events resulting from specific time-and-place-locked factors producing such outcomes as leadership and followership independent of biological determinants. Along these lines of thought, various authors have proposed that adaptations for leadership and followership do not exist as such, and that behaviours associated with such roles are simply by-products of adaptations for dominance and submission (Alexander 1987, Hollander 1985, Nicholson 2000, Wilson 1975).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.