Procedural Fairness in Competition Proceedings
Show Less

Procedural Fairness in Competition Proceedings

Edited by Paul Nihoul and Tadeusz Skoczny

How substantive competition rules are enforced plays a crucial role in achieving their goals. This thoughtful book examines procedural issues that have arisen from the increased enforcement of competition law worldwide.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Effectiveness through fairness? ‘Due process’ as an institutional precondition for effective decentralized EU competition law enforcement

Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel


Attention to ‘due process’ has come to play an increasingly central role in the day-to-day practice of decentralized EU competition law enforcement. Once a mere corrective mechanism to counter the unmitigated application of competition law provisions and sanctions to investigated undertakings, due process now additionally determines and fundamentally streamlines the institutional design of EU competition law enforcement at both supranational and national enforcement levels. Section 2 of this chapter conceptualizes the transformation of due process requirements from corrective to increasingly constitutive elements underlying the institutional design and operational functioning of supranational and national competition authorities. The importance of EU-inspired due process design has increased significantly in the wake of procedural modernization and ‘decentralization’ of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU enforcement by Regulation 1/2003. Section 3 identifies the constitutive role of due process as giving shape to an ‘effectiveness through fairness’ narrative underlying EU-inspired NCA institutional design. Relying on the principle of institutional autonomy, the Court of Justice of the European Union would in that model be responsible for the shaping and structuring of an ‘effectiveness through fairness’ enforcement environment in accordance with which the institutional formats and structures national competition authorities would have to be (re)designed as a matter of European Union law. Section 4 criticizes the nascent and judicially structured due process-inspired effectiveness through fairness narrative as the prevailing way forward in streamlining EU and national competition law enforcement structures.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.