Edited by Paul Nihoul and Tadeusz Skoczny
Chapter 10: Competition law enforcement: administrative versus judicial systems
Which system of competition law enforcement is preferable: an administrative system, in which the competition authority issues a decision, or a judicial system, in which it must instead procure a court decision? The background of the discussion to be held here is a serious charge that has been levelled at the procedure as implemented, for example, by the European Commission: at its core, this charge holds that in the European administrative procedure – as in many other, analogously designed procedural rules – the investigator, prosecutor and decision-maker is one and the same person – a fact that rules out the possibility of taking a fresh, unbiased perspective to reach an objective decision. Interestingly, this discussion has long spread beyond the specialised audience of law journals. The British weekly magazine The Economist opined in February 2010 in an article: Critics, whose concerns have increased with the ferocity of the sanctions imposed, say that by acting simultaneously as investigator, prosecutor, jury and sentencing judge, the commission is denying defendant firms the basic right to be heard by an impartial tribunal. They are right.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.