Comparing the Democratic Governance of Police Intelligence
Show Less

Comparing the Democratic Governance of Police Intelligence

New Models of Participation and Expertise in the United States and Europe

Edited by Thierry Delpeuch and Jacqueline E. Ross

"Intelligence-led policing" is an emerging movement of efforts to develop a more democratic approach to the governance of intelligence by expanding the types of expertise and the range of participants who collaborate in the networked governance of intelligence. This book examines how the partnership paradigm has transformed the ways in which participants gather, analyze, and use intelligence about security problems ranging from petty nuisances and violent crime to urban riots, organized crime, and terrorism. It explores changes in the way police and other security professionals define and prioritize these concerns and how the expanding range of stakeholders and the growing repertoire of solutions has transformed both the expertise and the deliberative processes involved.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Enhancing effectiveness in counterterrorism policing

Stephen J. Schulhofer


Officials who lead the counterterrorism effort at national and international levels now recognize that the apparatus of conventional law enforcement is of crucial importance for their mission. Local police have become a vital source of counterterrorism intelligence, and they often make a leading contribution to the measures deployed on the ground to thwart incipient terrorist plots. Indeed, counterterrorism analysts increasingly are aware that local police can not only help identify ‘homegrown’ terrorists, but also can play a major role even in connection with intelligence-gathering efforts aimed at checking dangers that arise abroad. Because local law enforcement agencies are well situated to building relationships with the communities in which terrorists try to hide and recruit members, a RAND Corporation report urges local police to ‘actively encourage and cultivate cooperation by building stronger ties with community leaders . . .’. This conception of preventive law counterterrorism basically echoes that which emerged from the ‘community policing’ insights of the 1980s and 1990s. As Gary LaFree and James Hendrickson note, ‘In many ways the community-oriented approach favored by successful police departments is the same kind of approach that is most likely to uncover terrorist operations’. Other analysts have similarly stressed that ‘state and local law enforcement agencies . . . may be uniquely positioned to augment federal intelligence capabilities by virtue of their presence in nearly every American community [and] their knowledge of local individuals and groups . . .’.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.