Linking EU Climate and Energy Policies
Show Less

Linking EU Climate and Energy Policies

Decision-making, Implementation and Reform

Jon Birger Skjærseth, Per Ove Eikeland, Lars H. Gulbrandsen and Torbjørg Jevnaker

Based on an innovative theoretical framework combining theories of EU policy making, negotiation and implementation, this comprehensive book examines EU climate and energy policies from the early 1990s until the adoption of new policies for 2030. The authors investigate how the linking of climate and energy concerns in policy packages has facilitated agreement among EU leaders with very different policy ambitions. Employing in-depth studies from a diverse range of energy-economic countries, the book also explores the impact of the implementation of policies on the climate and energy policy framework and the Energy Union initiative.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Implementation in Norway

Torbjørg Jevnaker


While formally outside the EU, Norway is associated with the EU through the EEA Agreement. This provides access to the internal market, subject to Norwegian implementation of relevant EU legislation – but not to EU decisionmaking. The EU’s package approach to climate and energy policy for 2020, with heavy involvement of the European Council, reduced Norway’s possibilities for informal influence. As Norway’s energy and emissions profile has differed from that of the EU, the package was not well aligned to the country’s energy and climate situation. Thus, hurdles were expected – and the implementation pattern observed was a mixture of support, delays and continued opposition. A combination of factors can explain this: differences between the situation of Norway and that of the EU, domestic politics and characteristics of the EEA Agreement – moreover, foot-dragging in implementation is easier if discussions are still ongoing at the EU level. Changes facilitated by the package have largely been absorbed, especially given possibilities for flexibility and compensation. The 2020 package was no game-changer, and experience with the 2020 package thus has had little impact on Norway’s 2030 position, which has remained largely stable. However, changes in EU priorities – notably towards ‘domestic’ emissions reduction – have forced Norway to look in new places for possibilities to offset domestic emissions, reconsidering its stance on participation in EU climate policy for non-traded sectors.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.