The Intersection of International Law and Domestic Law
Show Less

The Intersection of International Law and Domestic Law

A Theoretical and Practical Analysis

Davíd T. Björgvinsson

What are the theoretical and practical issues relating to the intersection between domestic and international law? This important new book discusses how general theories, including monism and dualism, transpire in practice. The author examines several key areas: the rules relating to treaty making and the ratification of treatises, the doctrine of automatic incorporation and transformation, the direct effect of international norms in the domestic system, and a discussion of the principle of consistent interpretation. With a focus on the European Convention on Human Rights, the author concludes that, although traditional theories are still relevant, they fall short in grasping the complexity of the different ways in which the legislator and the courts have given effect to international law on the domestic level.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: The treaty-making process and ratification of treaties

Davíd T. Björgvinsson


Part II, Section 1 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties presents several important rules in relation to the conclusion of treaties. These rules primarily aim at ensuring efficiency and clarity in the treaty-making process at the international level. The Vienna Convention offers, however, few substantive rules on the exercise of treaty-making power. It is accepted that in reality the treaty-making process in each and every country is regulated by national constitutions and statutory law. In all the countries covered, treaty negotiations and the conclusion of treaties, in the meaning of signing them, is purely an executive matter. According to Article 52(1) of the French constitution of 1958, the executive (President of the Republic) is responsible for concluding international treaties. The president is formally also responsible for negotiating a treaty, as he appoints those officials who are responsible for carrying them out on his behalf. It should be noted that Article 52, para. 1, only refers to treaties. Article 20, para. 1, of the constitution has been interpreted as investing the government with power to conclude international agreements (accords internationaux) which do not need to be ratified under Article 52, para. 2, of the constitution (see below). These could be considered as more simplified forms of treaties that do not fall under Article 52. According to Article 20, para. 2, the president shall be informed about all negotiations which could lead to a conclusion of an agreement which does not require ratification.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.