A Theoretical and Practical Analysis
Chapter 7: Remarks on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the Ægisson case
This case is considered by many as a landmark case on the relationship between national and international law in Iceland and on the issue of international law as a source of law in the Icelandic legal system. This judgment and several other judgments that followed have led to an exchange of views on this topical issue, where scholars disagree as to how to interpret this judgment. In particular, it is debated whether it should be interpreted as setting aside the principle of dualism, at least in the case of international human rights instruments. Later judgments have also been discussed and whether they should be interpreted as departing from the dualist approach and whether earlier accepted theories and principles relating to the relationship of national law and international law should be reconsidered. Expert opinions differ greatly as to whether these judgments are in conformity with the principle of dualism. As the judgment is very important for the subject matter of this book and reveals different aspects of the manifold bearing unincorporated international human rights treaties can have on the domestic level, it is worth taking a further look at.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.