Show Less
You do not have access to this content

The Economics of Open Access

On the Future of Academic Publishing

Thomas Eger and Marc Scheufen

Addressing the recent debate on how the future of academic publishing might look in a purely digital environment, this book analyzes the experiences of researchers with, as well as attitudes towards, ‘Open Access’ (OA) publishing. Drawing on a unique, in-depth survey with more than 10,000 respondents from 25 countries, Thomas Eger and Marc Scheufen discuss their findings in the light of recent policy attempts which have been trying to foster OA, revealing considerable shortcomings and lack of knowledge on fundamental features of the academic publishing market.
Show Summary Details
This content is available to you

References

Thomas Eger and Marc Scheufen

Acemoglu, D. and J. Robinson (2012), Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, New York, NY: Crown.
Agrawal, A.A. (2014), ‘Four More Reasons to be Skeptical of Open-Access Publishing’, Trends in Plant Science, 19 (3), 133.
Anderson, R. (2015), ‘Should We Retire the Term “Predatory Publishing”?’, The Scholarly Kitchen, May 11, accessed 9 February 2017 at https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2015/05/11/should-we-retire-the-term-predatory-publishing/.
Archambault, E., D. Amyot, D. Campbell, J. Caruso, P. Deschamps, A. Nicole, F. Provencher, L. Rebout and G. Roberge (2014), Evolution of Open Access Policies and Availability, 1996–2013, accessed 3 November 2016 at http://science-metrix.com/files/science-metrix/publications/d_4.5_sm_ec_dg-rtd_oa_policies_proportion_oa_1996-2013_v05p_0.pdf.
Armstrong, M. (2015), ‘Opening Access to Research’, Economic Journal, 125 (586), F1–F30.
Awre, C. (2006), ‘The Technology of Open Access’, in N. Jacobs (ed.), Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects, Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing, pp. 55–62.
Baker, M. (2016), ‘Open-access Index Delists Thousands of Journals. Many Publications Did Not Reapply after Leading Directory Tightened Its Quality Criteria’, Nature, 533, doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19871.
Baldwin, P. (2014), The Copyright Wars. Three Centuries of Trans-Atlantic Battle, Oxford, UK and Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Baldwin, R., M. Cave and M. Lodge (2012), Understanding Regulation. Theory, Strategy, and Practice, Second Edition, Oxford, UK and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Beall, J. (2013), ‘The Open-Access Movement Is Not Really about Open Access’, tripleC, 11 (2), 589–97, accessed 9 February 2017 at http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/viewFile/525/514.
Bénabou, R. and J. Tirole (2003), ‘Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation’, Review of Economic Studies, 70, 489–520.
Bergstrom, Th.C. (2013), http://www.journalprices.com/, accessed 25 September 2017.
Bergstrom, Th.C., P.N. Courant, R.P. McAfee and M.A. Williams (2014), ‘Evaluating Big Deal Journal Bundles’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 111 (26), 9425–30.
Bergstrom, Th.C. and R.P. McAffee (2013), ‘Big Deal Contract Project’, accessed 31 May 2017 at http://econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/Journals/BundleContracts.html.
Bergstrom, Th.C. and D.L. Rubinfeld (2010), ‘Alternative Economic Designs for Academic Publishing’, in R.C. Dreyfuss, H. First and D.L. Zimmerman (eds), Working Within the Boundaries of Intellectual Property. Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society, Oxford, UK and New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 137–48.
Bhattacharjee, Y. (2011), ‘Saudi Universities Offer Cash in Exchange for Academic Prestige’, Science, 334 (6061), 1344–5.
Björk, B.-C. (2016), ‘The Open Access Movement at a Crossroads – Are the Big Publishers and Academic Media Taking Over?’, Learned Publishing, 29 (2), 131–4.
Björk, B.-C. (2013), ‘Open Access Subject Repositories – an Overview’, preprint of an article accepted for publication in the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, accessed 6 November 2016 at http://www.openaccesspublishing.org/repositories/Subject_Repositories.pdf.
Björk, B.-C., P. Welling, M. Laakso, P. Majlender, T. Hedlund and G. Gudnason (2010), ‘Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009’, PLoS ONE 5 (6), e11273. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0011273.
Bornmann, L. and R. Mutz (2015), ‘Growth Rates of Modern Science: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on the Number of Publications and Cited References’, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66 (11), 2215–22.
Coase, R. (1974), ‘The Market for Goods and the Market for Ideas’, American Economic Review, 64 (2), 384–91.
Coccia, M. (2006), ‘Economic and Social Studies of Scientific Research: Nature and Origins’, Working Paper CERIS-CNR, 8 (7).
Dasgupta, P. and J. David (1987), ‘Information Disclosure and the Economics of Science and Technology’, in G.R. Feiwel (ed.), Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory, London, UK: Macmillan Press.
Diamond, A.M. (2005), ‘Measurement, Incentives and Constraints in Stigler’s Economics of Science’, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 12 (4), 635–61.
Eckdahl, T. (2004), ‘Review of: PLoS Biology – A Freely Available, Open Access Online Journal’, Cell Biology Education, 3 (1), 15–17.
Edlin, A.S. and D.L. Rubinfeld (2005), ‘The Bundling of Academic Journals’, American Economic Review – Papers and Proceedings, 95 (2), 441–5.
Edlin, A.S. and D.L. Rubinfeld (2004), ‘Exclusion or Efficient Pricing? The “Big Deal” Bundling of Academic Journals’, Antitrust Law Journal, 72 (1), 119–57.
Eger, T. (2015), ‘Copyright Under Fire: Some Comments from a Law and Economics Perspective on the Heated Debate on Copyright Law’, Hamburg Law Review, 1 (2), 25–40.
Eger, T., M. Kraft and P. Weise (1992), ‘On the Equilibrium Proportion of Innovation and Imitation’, Economics Letters, 38, 93–7.
Eger, T. and M. Scheufen (2012), ‘The Past and the Future of Copyright Law: Technological Change and Beyond’, in J. De Mot (ed.), Liber Amicorum Boudewijn Bouckaert, Brugge: die Keure, pp. 37–64.
Eger, T., M. Scheufen and D. Meierrieks (2016), ‘The Determinants of Open Access Publishing: Survey Evidence from Countries in the Mediterranean Open Access Network (MedOANet)’, Economia e Politica Industriale, 2 (7), 1–27, online: DOI: 10.1007/s40812-016-0027-8.
Eger, T., M. Scheufen and D. Meierrieks (2015), ‘The Determinants of Open Access Publishing: Survey Evidence from Germany’, European Journal of Law and Economics, 39 (3), 475–503, online: DOI: 10.1007/ s10657-015-9488-x.
Elkin-Koren, N. and E.M. Salzberger (2013), The Law and Economics of Intellectual Property in the Digital Age. The Limits of Analysis, London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
Eve, M.P. (2014), Open Access and the Humanities. Contexts, Controversies and the Future, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Feess, E. and M. Scheufen (2016), ‘Academic Copyright in the Publishing Game: a Contest Perspective’, European Journal of Law and Economics, 42 (2), 263–94.
Flexner, A. (1938/2017), ‘The Usefulness of Useful Knowledge’, originally published in Harper’s Magazine (1939); republished by Princeton University Press, with a companion essay by R. Dijkgraaf.
Frey, B.S. (1997), Not Just for the Money. An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Frey, B.S. and M. Osterloh (2015), ‘Impact Faktoren. Absurde Vermessung der Wissenschaft’, Soziale Welt, 66 (2), 141–8.
Gans, J.S. and G.B. Shephard (1994), ‘How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (1), 165–79.
Garfield, E. (2005), ‘The agony and the ecstasy – the history and meaning of the journal impact factor’, paper presented at International Congress  on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, Chicago, 16 September.
Garfield, E. (2003), ‘The Meaning of the Impact Factor’, International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 3 (2), 363–9.
Garfield, E. (1955), ‘Citation Indexes to Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas’, Science, 122 (3159), 108–11.
Gargouri, Y., V. Larivière, Y. Gingras, L. Carr, T. Brody and S. Harnad (2012), ‘Green and Gold Open Access Percentages and Growth, by Discipline’, in 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI), Science-Metrix and OST, Montreal, CA, 285–92, accessed 7 February 2017 at http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/340294/.
Hagner, M. (2015), Zur Sache des Buches, Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.
Harnad, S., T. Brody, F. Vallières, L. Carr, S. Hitchcock, Y. Gingras, C.  Oppenheim, H. Stamerjohanns and E.R. Hilf (2004), ‘The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access’, Serials Review, 30 (4), 310–14.
Hartgerink, C.H.J. (2017), Publication Cycle: A Study of the Public Library of Science (PLOS), accessed 27 June 2017 at https://www.authorea.com/users/2013/articles/36067-publication-cycle-a-study-of-the-public-library-of-science-plos/_show_article.
Haucap, J., I. Loebert, G. Spindler and S. Thorwarth (2016), Ökonomische Auswirkungen einer Bildungs- und Wissenschaftsschranke im Urheberrecht, DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven, No. 86, Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press, accessed 11 April 2017 at http://www.dice.hhu.de/fileadmin/redaktion/Fakultaeten/Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche_Fakultaet/DICE/Ordnungspolitische_Perspektiven/86_OP_Haucap_Loebert_Spindler_Thorwarth.pdf.
Haustein, S. and V. Larivière (2015), ‘The Use of Bibliometrics for Assessing Research: Possibilities, Limitations, and Adverse Effects’, in I. Welpe, J. Wollersheim, S. Ringelhan and M. Osterloh (eds), Incentives and Performance – Governance of Research Organization, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 121–39.
Heller, M.A. (ed.) (2009), Commons and Anticommons, vol. I and II, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Heller, M.A. (1998), ‘The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets’, Harvard Law Review, 111 (3), 621–88.
Hirsch, J.E. (2005), ‘An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569–72.
Houghton, J.W., B. Rasmussen, P. Sheehan, C. Oppenheim, A. Morris, C. Creaser et al (2009), Economic Implications of Alternative Scholarly Publishing Models: Exploring the Costs and Benefits, A Report to the Joint Information Systems Committee, London and Bristol, accessed 1 February 2017 at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/48352211_Economic_implications_of_alternative_scholarly_publishing_models_exploring_the_costs_and_benefits_JISC_EI-ASPM_Project_A_report_to_the_Joint_Information_Systems_Committee_JISC.
Jahn, N. and M. Tullney (2016), ‘A Study of Institutional Spending on Open Access Publication Fees in Germany’, PeerJ 4:e2323; DOI 10.7717/peerj.2323.
Katz, M.L. (1984), ‘Price Discrimination and Monopolistic Competition’, Econometrica, 52 (6), 1453–71.
King, D.W. (2007), ‘The Cost of Journal Publishing: a Literature Review and Commentary’, Learned Publishing, 20 (2), 85–106.
Krujatz, S. (2012), Open Access. Der offene Zugang zu wissenschaftlichen Informationen und die ökonomische Bedeutung urheberrechtlicher Ausschlussmacht für die wissenschaftliche Informationsversorgung, Tübing en: Mohr Siebeck.
Laakso, M. and B.-C. Björk (2016), ‘Hybrid Open Access – A Longitudinal Study’, Journal of Informetrics, 10 (4), 919–32.
Landes, W.M. and R.A. Posner (2003), The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Larivière, V., S. Haustein and P. Mongeon (2015), ‘The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era’, PLoS ONE 10 (6), accessed 6 November 2016 at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0127502.
Lawson, S. (2015), ‘Fee Waivers for Open Access Journals’, Publications, 3, 155–67.
Link, M. (2013), Open Access im Wissenschaftsbereich. Erlanger Schriften zum öffentlichen Recht, Bd. 4, Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
Long, J.S. and J. Freese (2014), Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, 3rd edition, College Station, Texas: Stata Press.
Lozano, G.A., V. Larivière and Y. Gingras (2012), ‘The Weakening Relationship Between the Impact Factor and Papers’ Citations in the Digital Age’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (11), 2140–45.
McCabe, M.J. and C.M. Snyder (2015), ‘Does Online Availability Increase Citations? Theory and Evidence from a Panel of Economics and  Business Journals’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 95 (2), 144–65.
McCabe, M.J. and C.M. Snyder (2005), ‘Open Access and Academic Journal Quality’, American Economic Review, 95 (2), 453–9.
Meho, L.I. (2007), ‘The Rise and Rise of Citation Analysis’, Physics World, 20 (1), 32–6.
Merton, R.K. (1973), ‘The Sociology of Science’, Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Merton, R.K. (1957), ‘Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science’, American Sociological Review, 22 (6), 635–59.
Migheli, M. and G.B. Ramello (2014), ‘Open Access Journals and Academics’ Behavior’, Economic Inquiry, 52 (4), 1250–66.
Migheli, M. and G.B. Ramello (2013), ‘Open Access, Social Norms and Publication Choice’, European Journal of Law and Economics, 35, 149–67.
Mittermaier, B. (2015), ‘Double Dipping in Hybrid Open Access – Chimera or Reality?’, accessed 3 November 2016 at https://juser.fzjuelich.de/record/190180/files/Double%20Dipping.pdf.
Mokyr, J. (2017), A Culture of Growth. The Origins of the Modern Economy, Oxford, UK and Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Moscon, V. (2014), Open Access in Italy, accessed 17 January 2017 at http://merlin.obs.coe.int/iris/2014/1/article32.en.html.
Mueller-Langer, F. and M. Scheufen (2013), ‘Academic Publishing and Open Access’, in R. Towse and Ch. Handke (eds), Handbook on the Digital Creative Economy, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 365–77.
Mueller-Langer, F., M. Scheufen and P. Waelbroeck (2016), Does Online Access Promote Research in Developing Countries? Empirical Evidence from Article-Level Data, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 16-14.
Mueller-Langer, F. and R. Watt (2016), ‘The Hybrid OA Citation Advantage: How Many More Cites is a $3,000 Fee Buying You?’, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 14-02.
Mueller-Langer, F. and R. Watt (2010), ‘Copyright and Open Access for Academic Works’, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 7 (1), 45–65, accessed 18 May 2017 at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1647586.
Nelson, Ph. (1970), ‘Information and Consumer Behavior’, Journal of Political Economy, 78 (2), 311–29.
North, D.C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
North, D.C. (1981), Structure and Change in Economic History, New York, NY: Norton.
North, D.C. and R.P. Thomas (1973), The Rise of the Western World. A New Economic History, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Osterloh, M. and B.S. Frey (2014a), ‘Ranking Games’, Evaluation Review, 39 (1), 102–29, accessed 8 April 2017 at https://www.bsfrey.ch/articles/C_578_2014.pdf, 1–28.
Osterloh, M. and B.S. Frey (2014b), ‘Academic Rankings between the “Republic of Science” and “New Public Management”’, in A. Lanteri and J. Vromen (eds), The Economics of Economists. Institutional Setting, Individual Incentives and Future Prospects, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 77–103.
Pinfield, S. (2015), ‘Making Open Access Work. The “State-of-the-Art” in Providing Open Access to Scholarly Literature’, Online Information Review, 39 (5), 604–36, accessed 2 February 2017 at http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2015-0167.
Powell, K. (2016), ‘Does it Take Too Long to Publish Research?’, Nature, 530 (7589), accessed 27 June 2017 at http://www.nature.com/news/does-it-take-too-long-to-publish-research-1.19320.
Prabha, Ch. (2007), ‘Shifting from Print to Electronic Journals in ARL University Libraries’, Journal Serials Review, 33 (1), 4–13, accessed 8 November 2016 at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00987913.2007.10765086.
Ramello, G.B. (2010), ‘Copyright and Endogenous Market Structure: a Glimpse from the Journal-Publishing Market’, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 7 (1), 7–29.
Regazzi, J.J. (2015), Scholarly Communications. A History from Content as King to Content as Kingmaker, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Rochet, J.-C. and J. Tirole (2003), ‘Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 1 (4), 990–1029.
Ryan, R.M. and E.L. Deci (2000), ‘Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions’, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
Samuelson, P.A. (1954), ‘The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 36 (4), 387–9.
Schekman, R. (2013), How to Break Free from the Stifling Grip of Luxury Journals, accessed 8 February 2017 at http://theconversation.com/how-to-break-free-from-the-stifling-grip-of-luxury-journals-21669.
Scheufen, M. (2015), Copyright Versus Open Access. On the Organisation and International Political Economy of Access to Scientific Knowledge, Heidelberg: Springer.
Schimmer, R., K.K. Geschuhn and A. Vogler (2015), ‘Disrupting the Subscription Journals’ Business Model for the Necessary Large-scale Transformation to Open Access. A Max Planck Digital Library Open Access Policy White Paper’, accessed 3 November 2016 at http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:2148961:7/component/escidoc:2149096/MPDL_OA-Transition_White_Paper.pdf.
Schmidt, N. (2016), Open Access. Hochschulrechtliche Veröffentlichungsund urheberrechtliche Anbietungspflichten des Hochschulprofessors. Schriften zum geistigen Eigentum und zum Wettbewerbsrecht, Bd. 79, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Seglen, P.O. (1997), ‘Why the Impact Factor of Journals Should Not Be Used for Evaluating Research’, British Medical Journal, 314 (7079), 498–502, accessed 8 November 2016 at http://www.bmj.com/content/314/7079/497.1.
Shavell, S. (2010), ‘Should Copyright of Academic Works Be Abolished?’, Journal of Legal Analysis, 2 (1), 301–58.
Siebeck, G. (2016), ‘Die Urheber wurden gar nicht erst gefragt’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 6 September, 14.
Solomon, D.J., M. Laakso and B.C. Björk; P. Suber (ed.) (2016), ‘Converting Scholarly Journals to Open Access: A Review of Approaches and Experiences’, Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc., Paper 27, accessed 11 May 2017 at http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=scholcom.
Stephan, P.E. and S.S. Levin (1992), Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place and Time, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
STM Report (2015), An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journal Publishing. Celebrating the 350th Anniversary of Journal Publishing, published by the International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, The Hague, accessed 12 August 2017 at http://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_02_20_STM_Report_2015.pdf.
Suber, P. (2012), Open Access, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Suber, P. (2006), ‘Open Access in the USA’, in N. Jacobs (ed.), Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects, Oxford, UK: Chandos, pp. 149–60.
Suber, P. and S. Arunachalam (2005), ‘Open Access to Science in the Developing World’, accessed 20 September 2017 at http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4725025/suber_worldinfocity.htm?sequence=1.
Tickel, A. (2016), Open Access to Research Publications. Independent Advice, accessed 17 January 2017 at www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/499455/ind-16-3-open-access-report.pdf.
Van Noorden, R. (2014), ‘Open-access Website Gets Tough. Leading Directory Tightens Listing Criteria to Weed Out Rogue Journals’, Nature, 512, DOI: 10.1038/512017a.
Vogel, G. and K. Kupferschmidt (2017), ‘Germany seeks “big flip” in publishing model’, Science, 357 (6353), 744–5.
Wallace, F.H. and T.J. Perri (2016), Economists Behaving Badly: Publications in Predatory Journals, Appalachian State University, Department of Economics Working Paper No. 16-08, accessed 18 May 2017 at http://econ.appstate.edu/RePEc/pdf/wp1608.pdf.
West, J.D., C.T. Bergstrom and Th.C. Bergstrom (2010), ‘Bic Macs and Eigenfactor Scores: Don’t Let the Correlation Coefficients Fool You’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1800–807, available at http://works.bepress.com/ted_bergstrom/108/.
Willinsky, J. (2009), The Access Principle. The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Xia, J., J.L. Harmon, K.G. Connolly, R.M. Donnelly, M.R. Anderson and H.A. Howard (2015), ‘Who Publishes in “Predatory” Journals?’, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66 (7), 1406–17.