Rivers, Rifles, Rice, and Religion
Chapter 5: Rivers, rifles, and religion: the primacy of private law in Western Europe
The Western legal tradition is today the paramount source of perceptions of law worldwide. Conceptions and processes, which for Europeans by the nineteenth century identified the attributes of law in all “civilized” nations, have become universally accepted. Hand in glove with prevailing notions of statehood, the understanding of law as predominantly a system of private law enforced through litigation was evidenced in the centrality of civil (private law) codes and judicially constructed common (private) law. Today law faculties throughout the world continue to treat private law—contracts, civil delicts (torts), property—as law’s core components. In law schools in the United States, multiple fields of regulatory public law—with the notable exception of criminal law—are sporadically taught as electives. Seldom if ever is any distinction as described in Chapter 1 noted between the manner of private and public law enforcement. This is in part the result of the pervasive influence of private law institutions. The role of judges and judicial processes, not to mention the emphasis on “rights,” are private law borrowings that have become fundamental features of the Western legal tradition. They shape all fields of law. We might well ask how could this be if in developmental terms public law orders represent the more advanced prototype as evidenced in the contemporary expansion of public law in all legal systems. Why Western law succeeded globally is a relatively easy question to answer.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.