Integrated Human Rights in Practice
Show Less

Integrated Human Rights in Practice

Rewriting Human Rights Decisions

Edited by Eva Brems and Ellen Desmet

This book aims to introduce concrete and innovative proposals for a holistic approach to supranational human rights justice through a hands-on legal exercise: the rewriting of decisions of supranational human rights monitoring bodies. The contributing scholars have thus redrafted crucial passages of landmark human rights judgments and decisions, ‘as if human rights law were really one’, borrowing or taking inspiration from developments and interpretations throughout the whole multi-layered human rights protection system. In addition to the rewriting exercise, the contributors have outlined the methodology and/or theoretical framework that guided their approaches and explain how human rights monitoring bodies may adopt an integrated approach to human rights law.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: Caring, rescuing or punishing? Rewriting RMS v Spain (ECtHR) from an integrated approach to the rights of women and children in poverty

Rewriting Human Rights Decisions

Valeska David


The ‘rescuing’ of children from poor and otherwise ‘deviant’ families is a longstanding and yet unsettled concern in many countries. In 2005 Spanish social services removed a girl aged nearly 4 years old and placed her in foster care on the sole account of her mother’s poverty. Mother and daughter were never reunited. In 2013 the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found a violation of the applicant’s right to family life, but dismissed her complaint on discrimination. Albeit the judgment is welcome and offers grounds for praise, its reasoning is fragmentary. This chapter analyses and rewrites the ECHR judgment in RMS by integrating the perspective of the rights of women and children living in poverty. First, the chapter problematizes the allocation of children’s care and well-being to the ‘private’ realm of families, and questions the way the Court addressed the impermissibility of family separation on the ground of poverty. Second, attention is drawn to compounded stereotypes and dominant notions on valued families underlying the decisions of the Spanish authorities and which the ECHR failed to uncover. Third, the chapter revisits the ECHR scrutiny of the domestic judicial control and decision-making process over the girl’s removal and placement.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.