Integrated Human Rights in Practice
Show Less

Integrated Human Rights in Practice

Rewriting Human Rights Decisions

Edited by Eva Brems and Ellen Desmet

This book aims to introduce concrete and innovative proposals for a holistic approach to supranational human rights justice through a hands-on legal exercise: the rewriting of decisions of supranational human rights monitoring bodies. The contributing scholars have thus redrafted crucial passages of landmark human rights judgments and decisions, ‘as if human rights law were really one’, borrowing or taking inspiration from developments and interpretations throughout the whole multi-layered human rights protection system. In addition to the rewriting exercise, the contributors have outlined the methodology and/or theoretical framework that guided their approaches and explain how human rights monitoring bodies may adopt an integrated approach to human rights law.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Developing the full range of state obligations and integrating intersectionality in a case of involuntary sterilization: CEDAW Committee, 4/2004, AS v Hungary

Rewriting Human Rights Decisions

Eva Brems

Abstract

In this chapter, the author has rewritten a CEDAW case concerning coerced sterilization of a Roma woman. The CEDAW Committee established violations of three CEDAW provisions. Article 10(h) CEDAW obliges states to ensure access to information and advice on family planning. Article 12 CEDAW concerns access to health care services, including those related to family planning, as well as ‘appropriate services in connection with pregnancy, confinement and the post-natal period’. Article 16(1)(e) CEDAW states the equal right of men and women ‘to decide freely and responsibly on the number and spacing of their children and to have access to the information, education and means to enable them to exercise these rights’. This rewriting exercise, which draws inspiration from ECtHR cases as well as from concluding observations of CAT, CERD and HRC, has two objectives: (1) beefing up the legal reasoning; and (2) adding a minority rights perspective (intersectionality). Under the first objective, the rewrite adds an explicit positive state obligation of a preventive nature, as well as a positive state obligation to investigate, and expands the references to external sources. Under the second objective, the rewritten text emphasizes two dimensions of the minority experience, by adding a cultural perspective, and an emphasis on vulnerability and marginalization.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.