Show Less
You do not have access to this content

Publish or Perish

Perceived Benefits versus Unintended Consequences

Imad A. Moosa

Imad Moosa’s thought-provoking book explores the contemporary doctrine that plagues the academic sphere: the principle of publish or perish. This book identifies the pressures placed upon academics to either publish their work regularly, or suffer the consequences, including lack of promotion, or even redundancy.
Show Summary Details
This content is available to you

References

Perceived Benefits versus Unintended Consequences

Imad A. Moosa

Aad, G., Abajyan, T. and Abbott, B. et al. (2012) Observation of a New Particle in the Search for the Standard Model, Physics Letters B, 716, 1–29.
Aad, G., Abat, E. and Abdallah, J. et al. (2008) The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Journal of Instrumentation, 3 (S08003), August. Accessed 3 August 2017 at http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08003/pdf.
Abusson, K. (2017) Scientists Outwit Predatory Publishers by Tricking Them into Appointing a Fake Editor, The Age, 23 March.
ACIL Allen Consulting (2013) Report to The Australian Research Council. Accessed 8 August 2017 at www.arc.gov.au/sites/default/files/…/ERA/Benefits%20realisation%20review.docx.
Aitkenhead, D. (2013) Peter Higgs: I Wouldn’t be Productive Enough for Today’s Academic System, The Guardian, 7 December.
Al-Awqati, Q. and Neilson, E.G. (2008) Author Misrepresentation in the Submission of Redundant Papers, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 19, 413–423.
Al-Nakeeb, B. (2016) Two Centuries of Parasitic Economics, Charleston, SC: CreateSpace.
Alexander, J.C. and Mabry, R.H. (1994) The Relative Significance of Journals, Authors, and Articles Cited in Financial Research, Journal of Finance, 44, 697–712.
Altbach, P.G. (2004) Globalisation and the University: Myths and Realities in an Unequal World, Tertiary Education and Management, 10, 3–25.
Altbach, P.G. (2006) The Tyranny of Citations, Industry and Higher Education, 43, 3–4.
Altbach, P.G. (2015) The Deteriorating Guru: The Crisis of the Professoriate, International Higher Education. Accessed 2 August 2017 at http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ihe/article/view/7426.
Anderson, D.L. and Tressler, J. (2014) The New Zealand Performance-Based Research Fund and its Impact on Publication Activity in Economics, Research Evaluation, 23, 1–11.
Anderson, R. (2013) High Noon – A Publisher Threatens to ‘Lunch’ a Criminal Case Against Librarian Critic, Scholarly Kitchen, 20 May.
Andreescu, L. (2013) Self-plagiarism in Academic Publishing: The Anatomy of a Misnomer, Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, 775–797.
Archambault, E. and Vignola-Gagné, E. (2004) The Use of Bibliometrics in the Social Sciences and Humanities, Montreal: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
Armstrong, J.S. (1982) Is Review by Peers as Fair as It Appears?, Interfaces, 12, 62–74.
Armstrong, J.S. (1996) The Ombudsman: Management Folklore and Management Science – On Portfolio Planning, Escalation Bias and Such, Interfaces, 26, 25–55.
Arthurs, H.W., Blais, R.A. and Thompson, J. (1994) Integrity in Scholarship: A Report to Concordia University, Independent Committee of Inquiry into Academic and Scientific Integrity. Accessed 2 August 2017 at http://archives.concordia.ca/sites/default/files/uploaded-documents/pages/2011/07/26/Arthurs_report.pdf.
Astley, W.G. (1985) Administrative Science as Socially Constructed Truth, Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 497–513.
Australian Business Deans Council (2013) Australian Business Deans Council Journal Quality List: 2013 Review Overall Report. Accessed 8 August 2017 at http://www.abdc.edu.au/data/journal_review2013/Overall_Final_Report_-_Submissions_Period_-_Sept_2013.pdf.
Australian Research Council (2008a) ERA Indicator Descriptors, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Accessed 8 August 2017 at archive.arc.gov.au/archive_files/ERA/2009/Key…/Indicator_Descriptors.pdf.
Australian Research Council (2008b) Consultation to Develop Outlet Journal Rankings, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
Australian Research Council (2017a) What is the Purpose of ERA? Accessed 8 August 2017 at http://www.arc.gov.au/excellence-research-australia.
Australian Research Council (2017b) University Consultation on ERA 2018 Journal List. Accessed 9 August 2017 at http://www.arc.gov.au/era-2018.
Bakanic, V., McPhail, C. and Simon, R.J. (1987) The Manuscript Review and Decision-making Process, American Sociological Review, 52, 631–42.
Baker, M. (2016) 1,500 Scientists Lift the Lid on Reproducibility, Nature, 533, 452–454.
Barbour, V. (2015) Publish or Perish Culture Encourages Scientists to Cut Corners, The Conversation, 23 September. Accessed 9 August 2017 at http://theconversation.com/publish-or-perish-culture-encourages-scientists-to-cut-corners-47692.
Bauerlein, M. (2011) Literary Research: Costs and Impact, Center for College Affordability and Productivity, November. Accessed 2 August 2017 at http://centerforcollegeaffordability.org/uploads/Literary_Research_Bauerlein.pdf.
Beall, J. (2010a) Predatory Open-access Scholarly Publishers, Charleston Advisor, 10, 10–17.
Beall, J. (2010b) Update: Predatory Open-access Scholarly Publishers, Charleston Advisor, 12, 50.
Beall, J. (2012) Predatory Publishers are Corrupting Open Access, Nature, 12 September.
Beard, T.R., Ford, G.S., Kim, H. and Spiwak, L.J. (2011) Regulatory Expenditures, Economic Growth and Jobs: An Empirical Study, Phoenix Center Policy Bulletin No. 28. Accessed 2 August 2017 at www.phoenixcenter.org/PolicyBulletin/PCPB28onepagerFinal.pdf.
Beattie, V. and Goodacre, A. (2006) A New Method for Ranking Academic Journals in Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Business Research, 36, 65–91.
Beattie, V. and Ryan, R.J. (1989) Performance Indices and Related Measures of Journal Reputation in Accounting, British Accounting Review, 21, 267–278.
Beed, C. and Beed, C. (1996) Measuring the Quality of Academic Journals: The Case of Economics, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 18, 369–396.
Begley, C.G. (2013) Reproducibility: Six Flags for Suspect Work, Nature, 497, 433–434.
Begley, C.G. and Ellis, L.M. (2012) Drug Development: Raise Standards for Preclinical Cancer Research, Nature, 483, 531–533.
Bergmann, B. (1999) Abolish the Nobel Prize for Economics, Challenge, 42, 52–67.
Bergstrom, T.C. (2001) Free Labor for Costly Journals?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 183–198.
Bergstrom, T.C. (2002) Ecology Journals: Circulation Figures, 4 September. Accessed 6 August 2017 at http://octavia.zoology.washington.edu/publishing/ecology_circulation.html.
Berlinerblau, J. (2015) Teach or Perish, Chronicle of Higher Education, 19 January.
Bernanke, B.S. (2004) Editorial Statement, American Economic Review, 94, 404.
Beyer, J., Chanove, R.G. and Fox, W.B. (1995) The Review Process and the Fates of Manuscripts Submitted to AMJ, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1219–1260.
Bird, S.J. (2002) Self-plagiarism and Dual and Redundant Publications: What is the Problem? Commentary on ‘Seven ways to Plagiarize: Handling Real Allegations of Research Misconduct’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 8, 543–544.
Blanchard, K.D. (2015) You Publish, We Perish, Chronicle of Higher Education, 2 March.
Bloembergen, N. (1993) Physical Review Records the Birth of the Laser Era, Physics Today, 46, 28–31.
Blommestein. H.J. (2009) The Financial Crisis as a Symbol of the Failure of Academic Finance (A Methodological Digression), Journal of Financial Transformation, 27, 3–8.
Bohannon, J. (2013) Who’s Afraid of Peer Review? Science, 342, 60–65.
Boice, R., Pecker, G., Zaback, E. and Barlow, D.H. (1985) A Challenge to Peters and Ceci’s Conclusions with an Examination of Editorial Files for Reviewer Appropriateness, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 744–45.
Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H. and Rodriguez, M.A. (2008) Towards Usage-based Impact Metrics: First Results from the MESUR Project, in Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Pittsburgh, PA, June.
Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A, and Chute, R. (2009) A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures, PLOS ONE, 29 June. Accessed 6 August 2017 at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0006022.
Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Smith, J. and Luce, R. (2005) Toward Alternative Metrics of Journal Impact: A Comparison of Download and Citation Data, Information Processing and Management, 41, 1419–1440.
Bollerslev, T. (2008) Glossary to ARCH (GARCH), CREATES Research Papers, No. 2008–49.
Bontis, N. and Serenko, A. (2009) A Follow-up Ranking of Academic Journals, Journal of Knowledge Management, 13, 16–26.
Bornmann, L. and Daniel, H.D. (2009a) Extent of Type I and Type II Errors in Editorial Decisions: A Case Study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Journal of Infometrics, 3, 348–352.
Bornmann, L. and Daniel, H.D. (2009b) The State of h-Index Research, EMBO Reports, No. 10.
Bretag, T. and Mahmud, S. (2009) Self-plagiarism or Appropriate Textual Re-use?, Journal of Academic Ethics, 7, 193–205.
Broad, W. (1981) The Publishing Game: Getting More for Less, Science, 21, 1137–1139.
Brochard, L. and Brun-Buisson, C. (2007) Salami Publication: A Frequent Practice Affecting Readers’ Confidence, Intensive Care Medicine, 33, 212–213.
Broome, M. (2004) Self-plagiarism: Oxymoron, Fair Use, or Scientific Misconduct?, Nursing Outlook, 52, 273–274.
Brown, L.D. and Gardner, J.C. (1985) Using Citation Analysis to Assess the Impact of Journals and Articles on Contemporary Accounting Research, Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 84–109.
Brown, L.D. and Huefner, R.S. (1994) The Familiarity with and Perceived Quality of Accounting Journals: Views of Senior Accounting Faculty in Leading US MBA Programs, Contemporary Accounting Research, 11, 223–250.
Buela-Casal, C. (2010) Scientific Journal Impact Indexes and Indicators for Measuring Researchers’ Performance, Revista de Psicodidáctica, 15, 3–19.
Bulletin of the Association of American Colleges (1938) (Vol. 24). Accessed 1 August 2017 at https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Liberal_Education.html?id=1ZUVAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y.
Burnham, J.C. (1990) The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review, JAMA, 263, 1323–1329.
Bushaway, R.W. (2003) Managing Research, Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Butler, D. (1999) Referee Quits Journal Over Price Rise as Library Faces Cutbacks, Nature, 399, 623.
Campanario, J.M. (1993a) Consolation for the Scientist: Sometimes It is Hard to Publish Papers that are Later Highly-cited, Social Studies of Science, 23, 342–362.
Campanario, J.M. (1993b) Not in Our Nature, Nature, 361, 488.
Campanario, J.M. (1995a) Commentary: On Influential Books and Journal Articles Initially Rejected Because of Negative Referees’ Evaluations, Science Communication, 16, 304–325.
Campanario, J.M. (1996) Have Referees Rejected Some of the Most-cited Articles of all Times?, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47, 302–310.
Campanario, J.M. (1997) The Journal Scout, Scientist, 11, 9.
Campanario, J.M. (1998a) Peer Review for Journals as It Stands Today – Part 1, Science Communication, 19, 181–211.
Campanario, J.M. (1998b) Peer Review for Journals as It Stands Today – Part 2, Science Communication, 19, 277–306.
Campbell, B. (2008) Escape from the Impact Factor, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8, 5–7.
Card, D. and DellaVigna, S. (2013) Nine Facts about Top Journals in Economics, Journal of Economic Literature, 51, 144–161.
Chang, A.C. and Li, P. (2015) Is Economics Research Replicable? Sixty Published Papers from Thirteen Journals Say ‘Usually Not’, Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2015–083, Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Chang, C., McAleer, M. and Oxley, L. (2011a) What Makes a Great Journal Great in the Sciences? Which Came First, the Chicken or the Egg? Scientometrics, 87, 17–40.
Chang, C., McAleer, M. and Oxley, L. (2011b) Great Expectations: Great Papers, Great Journals, Great Econometrics, Econometric Reviews, 30, 583–619.
Chang, C., McAleer, M. and Oxley, L (2011c) What Makes a Great Journal Great in Economics? The Singer Not the Song, Journal of Economic Surveys, 25, 326–361.
Chapman, B., McDonald, P. and Allan, P. (2011) ERA Threat to Policy Debate, The Australian, 25 May.
Chappell, B. (2013) Publisher Threatens Librarian with $1 Billion Lawsuit, NPR, 15 May.
Chawla, D.S. (2017) Mystery as Controversial List of Predatory Publishers Disappears, Science, 17 January. Accessed 3 August 2017 at http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/01/mystery-controversial-list-predatory-publishers-disappears.
Chopin, N., Gelman, A., Mengersen, K.L. and Robert, C.P. (2012) In Praise of the Referee. Accessed 6 August 2017 at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1205.4304.pdf.
Cicchetti, D. (1991) The Reliability of Peer Review for Manuscript and Grant Submissions: A Cross-disciplinary Investigation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 119–135.
Clery, D. and Bradley, D. (1994) Underhanded ‘Breakthrough’ Revealed, Science, 265, 21.
Cohen, P. (2010) Peer Review Faces Web Review, International Herald Tribune, 25 August.
Colander, D., Föllmer, H. and Haas, A. et al. (2009) The Financial Crisis and the Systemic Failure of Academic Economics, Kiel Working Papers, No. 1489.
Colman, A.M. (1982) Manuscript Evaluation by Journal Referees and Editors: Randomness or Bias? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 205–206.
Colpaert, J. (2012) The ‘Publish and Perish’ Syndrome, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25, 383–391.
Colquhoun, D. (2011) Publish-or-Perish: Peer Review and the Corruption of Science. The Guardian, 5 September. Accessed 1 August 2017 at https://www.theguardian.com/science/2011/sep/05/publish-perish-peer-review-science.
Coolidge, H.J. and Lord, R.H. (1932) Archibald Cary Coolidge: Life and Letters, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Cooper, M.D. and McGregor, G.F. (1994) Using Article Photocopy Data in Bibliographic Models for Journal Collection Management, Library Quarterly, 64, 386–413.
Corbyn, Z. (2008) Almost 200 Academic Staff Fight Against RAE Exclusion, Times Higher Education Supplement, 7 August.
Coser, L.A. (1975) Two Methods in Search of a Substance, American Sociological Review, 40, 691–700.
Cotton, P. (1993) Flaws Documented, Reforms Debated at Congress on Journal Peer Review, Journal of the American Medical Association, 270, 2775–2778.
Council of Writing Program Administrators (2014) Defining and Avoiding Plagiarism: The WPA Statement on Best Practices. Accessed 3 August 2017 at http://wpacouncil.org/files/wpa-plagiarism-statement.pdf.
Crandall, R. (1982) Editorial Responsibilities in Manuscript Review, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 207–208.
CTV News (2017) Website Tracking So-called ‘Predatory Publishers’ Taken Offline, 21 January. Accessed 8 August 2017 at http://www.ctvnews.ca/health/website-tracking-so-called-predatory-publishers-taken-offline-1.3251792.
Curry, J. (2014) Are Academia and Publishing Destroying Scientific Innovation?, Climate Etc. Blog, 8 April. Accessed 9 August 2017 at http://judithcurry.com/2014/04/08/are-academia-and-publishing-destroying-scientific-innovation/.
Cyranoski, D. (2014) Stem-cell Scientist Found Guilty of Misconduct, Nature, 1 April. Accessed 3 August 2017 at http://www.nature.com/news/stem-cell-scientist-found-guilty-of-misconduct-1.14974.
Darmoni, S.J., Roussel, F. and Benichou, J. et al. (2000) Reading Factor as a Credible Alternative to Impact Factor: A Preliminary Study, Technology and Health Care, 8, 174–175.
Darmoni, S.J., Roussel, F. and Benichou, J. et al. (2002) Reading Factor: A New Bibliometric Criterion for Managing Digital Libraries, Journal of the Medical Library Association, 90, 323–327.
Davis, P. (2013) Post Open Access Sting: An Interview with John Bohannon, The Scholarly Kitchen, 12 November.
Davis, P. (2016) Whither Portable Peer Review?, The Scholarly Kitchen, 19 December. Accessed 9 August 2017 at https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2016/12/19/whither-portable-peer-review/.
Deem, R., Mok, K.H. and Lucas, L. (2008) Transforming Higher Education in Whose Image? Exploring the Concept of the ‘World-Class’ University in Europe and Asia, Higher Education Policy, 21, 83–97.
De Rond, M. and Millier, A.N. (2005) Publish or Perish: Bane or Boon of Academic Life? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 321–329.
Dharmapala, D. and McAleer, M. (1996) Econometric Methodology and the Philosophy of Science, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 49, 9–37.
Djuric, D. (2015) Penetrating the Omerta of Predatory Publishing: The Romanian Connection, Science and Engineering Ethics, 21, 183–202.
Donovan, C. (2005) A Review of Current Australian and International Practice in Measuring the Quality and Impact of Publicly Funded Research in the Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Canberra: Australian National University, Research School of Social Sciences, Research Evaluation and Policy Project.
Dowd, K. (2008) Moral Hazard and the Financial Crisis, Cato Journal, 29, 141–166.
Doyle J.R., Arthurs, A.J., McAulay, L. and Osborne, P.G. (1996) Citation as Effortful Voting: A Reply to Jones, Brinn and Pendlebury, Omega, 24, 603–606.
Eastwood, D. (2007) Future Framework for Research Assessment and Funding, HEFCE Circular Letter No. 06/2007. Accessed 8 August 2017 at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100303171159/http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/circlets/2007/cl06_07/.
Egghe, L. (2006) Theory and Practice of the g-index, Scientometrics, 69, 131–152.
Egghe, L. and Rousseau, R. (2000) Aging, Obsolescence, Impact, Growth, and Utilization: Definitions and Relations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 1004–1017.
Eisen, M. (2013) It is NOT Junk, Michael Eisen Blog, 3 October. Accessed 7 August 2017 at http://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=1439.
Elliott, D.B. (2013) Salami Slicing and the SPU: Publish or Perish? Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 3, 625–626.
Ellis, L.V. and Durden, G.C. (1991) Why Economists Rank their Journals the Way They Do, Journal of Economics and Business, 43, 265–270.
Elmer, G.L. (1982) Research Publications in Biotechnology: An Appraisal, in G.T. Tsao (ed.), Annual Reports on Fermentation Process, Vol. 5, New York: Academic Press.
Enago Academy (2016a) Guest Authors: Think Twice Before You Sign On, 24 June. Accessed 10 August 2017 at https://www.enago.com/academy/guest-authors-in-research-paper/.
Enago Academy (2016b) Retraction of Articles Due to Duplication of Content: A Report of Five Recent Cases. Accessed 3 August 2017 at https://www.enago.com/academy/retraction-of-articles-due-to-duplication-of-content/.
Enago Academy (2017) Tackling the Rapid Growth of Predatory Publishers, 10 February. Accessed 3 August 2017 at https://www.enago.com/academy/tackling-the-rapid-growth-of-predatory-publishers/.
Energy Economics (2016) Special Issue on Replication in Energy Economics. Accessed 3 August 2017 at https://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy-economics/call-for-papers/special-issue-on-replication-in-energy-economics.
Engle, R.F. (1982) Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity, with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation, Econometrica, 50, 987–1007.
Epstein, W.M. (1990) Confirmational Response Bias among Social Work Journals, Science, Technology and Human Values, 15, 9–38.
Ernst, R.R. (2010) The Follies of Citation Indices and Academic Ranking Lists: A Brief Commentary to ‘Bibiliometrics as a Weapon of Mass Citation’, Chimia, 64, 90.
Errami, M. and Garner, H. (2008) A Tale of Two Citations, Nature, 451, 397–399.
Expert Advisory Group for an RQF (2005) Research Quality Framework: Assessing the Quality and Impact of Research in Australia, RQF Issues Paper, March 2005. Accessed 8 August 2017 at http://www.csu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/51472/rqf_issuespaper.pdf.
Eysenck, H.J. and Eysenck, S.B.G. (1992) Peer Review: Advice to Referees and Contributors, Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 393–399.
Fanelli, D. (2010) Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data, PLOS ONE, 21 April. Accessed 2 August 2017 at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0010271.
Fanelli, D., Costas, R. and Larivière, V. (2015) Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity, PLOS ONE, 17 June, e0127556.
Fang, F.C., Casadevall, A. and Morrison, R.P. (2011) Retracted Science and the Retraction Index, Infection and Immunity, 79, 3855–3859.
Fang, F.C., Steen, R.G. and Casadevall, A. (2012) Misconduct Accounts for the Majority of Retracted Scientific Publications, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 17028–17033.
Feinstein, A.R. (1991) Construction, Consent and Condemnation in Research on Peer Review, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44, 339–341.
Fishman, T. (2009) We Know It When We See It Is Not Good Enough: Toward a Standard Definition of Plagiarism that Transcends Theft, Fraud, and Copyright, in Proceedings of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity, 28–30 September, University of Wollongong.
Flaherty, C. (2013) Librarians and Lawyers, Inside Higher Ed, 15 February. Accessed 3 August 2017 at https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/02/15/another-publisher-accuses-librarian-libel.
Ford, E.W., Duncan, J. and Bedeian, A. et al. (2003) Mitigating Risks, Visible Hands, Inevitable Disasters, and Soft Variables: Management Research that Matters to Managers, Academy of Management Executive, 17, 46–60.
Foster, J.G., Rzhetsky, A. and Evans, J.A. (2015) Tradition and Innovation in Scientists, American Sociological Review, 80, 875–908.
Fox, J. (2009) The Myth of Rational Markets, New York: Harper Collins.
Franke, R. and Kaul, J.D. (1978) The Hawthorne Experiments: First Statistical Interpretations, American Sociological Review, 43, 623–643.
Franks Commission (1966) Report of Commission of Inquiry, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frey, B.S., Savage, D.A. and Torgler, B. (2010a) Noblesse Oblige? Determinants of Survival in a Life and Death Situation, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 74, 1–11.
Frey, B.S., Savage, D.A. and Torgler, B. (2010b) Interaction of Natural Survival Instincts and Internalized Social Norms Exploring the Titanic and Lusitania Disasters, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 4862–4865.
Frey, B.S., Savage, D.A. and Torgler, B. (2011a) Who Perished on the Titanic? The Importance of Social Norms, Rationality and Society, 23, 35–49.
Frey, B.S., Savage, D.A. and Torgler, B. (2011b) Behavior under Extreme Conditions: The Titanic Disaster, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25, 209–222.
Friedman, M. and Schwartz, A.J. (1982) Monetary Trends in the United States and the United Kingdom: Their Relation to Income, Prices, and Interest Rates, 1867–1975, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, M. and Schwartz, A.J. (1991) Alternative Approaches to Analyzing Economic Data, American Economic Review, 81, 39–49.
Gans, J.S. and Shepherd, G.B. (1994) How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 165–179.
García, J. (1981) Tilting at the Paper Mills of Academe, American Psychologist, 36, 149–158.
Garcia-Ferrer, A. and Poncela, P. (2003) From Zero to Infinity: Use and Abuse of Impact Factors, Journal Rankings and the Evaluation of Academic Economic Research in Spain, WP01–03, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Accessed 4 August 2017 at http://www.ucm.es/info/icae/seminario/seminario0304/18nov.pdf.
Garfield, E. (1996) What is the Primordial Reference for the Phrase ‘Publish or Perish’?, The Scientist, 10, 11.
Garfield, E. (1998) The Use of Journal Impact Factors and Citation Analysis for Evaluation of Science, paper at the 41st Annual Meeting of the Council of Biology Editors, Salt Lake City, 4 May.
Garfield, E. (2006) The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor, Journal of the American Medical Association, 295, 90–93.
Gasson, C. (2004) The Economics of Academic Publishing, Royal Economic Society, 2 April. Accessed 3 August 2017 at http://www.res.org.uk/view/art2Apr04Features2.html.
Geman, D. (2007) Ten Reasons Why Conference Papers Should be Abolished. Accessed 2 August 2017 at http://www.cis.jhu.edu/publications/papers_in_database/GEMAN/Ten_Reasons.pdf.
Genoni, P. and Haddow, G. (2009) ERA and the Ranking of Australian Humanities Journals, Australian Humanities Review, May. Accessed 4 August 2017 at http://www.australianhumanitiesreview.org/archive/Issue-May-2009/genoni&haddow.htm.
Gershman, S. (2014) The Exploitative Economics of Academic Publishing, Footnote1, 18 March. Accessed 3 August 2017 at http://www.footnote1.com/the-exploitative-economics-of-academic-publishing/.
Gilbert, C.L. (1986) Professor Hendry’s Econometric Methodology, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 48, 283–307.
Gipp, B. (2014) Citation-based Plagiarism Detection: Detecting Disguised and Cross-language Plagiarism Using Citation Pattern Analysis, Weisbaden: Springer Vieweg.
Glänzel, W. (2009) The Multi-dimensionality of Journal Impact, Scientometrics, 78, 355–374.
Goertzel, T. (2002) Econometric Modeling as Junk Science, The Skeptical Inquirer, 26, 19–23.
Gordon, M.D. (1979) Peer Review in Physics, Physics Bulletin, 30, 12–13.
Gordon, R.A. and Howell, J.E. (1959) Higher Education for Business, New York: Columbia University Press.
Gorn, G.J. (1982) The Effects of Music in Advertising on Choice Behavior: A Classical Conditioning Approach, Journal of Marketing, 46, 94–101.
Green, L. (2005) Reviewing the Scourge of Self-plagiarism, M/C Journal, October. Accessed 10 August 2017 at http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0510/07-green.php.
Greene, M. (2007) The Demise of the Lone Author, Nature, 450, 1165.
Greenwood, D.C. (2007) Reliability of Journal Impact Factor Rankings, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7, 48.
Guerrero-Bote, V.P. and Moya-Anegón, F. (2013) Relationship Between Downloads and Citation and the Influence of Language, in J. Gorraiz, E. Schiebel and C. Gumpenberger et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vienna: Austrian Institute of Technology, 1469–1484.
Guerrero-Bote, V.P. and Moya-Anegón, F. (2014) Relationship Between Downloads and Citations at Journal and Paper Levels, and the Influence of Language, Scientometrics, 101, 1043–1065.
Halkos, G. and Tzeremes, N. (2011) Measuring Economic Journals’ Citation Efficiency: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach, Scientometrics, 88, 979–1001.
Halkos, G. and Tzeremes, N. (2012) Ranking Accounting, Banking and Finance Journals: A Note, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Paper No. 36166.
Halonen, E. (2013) Research Heroes: Richard Thaler, Indecision Blog, 15 January. Accessed 2 August 2017 at https://indecisionblog.com/2013/01/15/research-heroes-richard-thaler/.
Hambrick, D.C. (1994) 1993 Presidential Address: What if the Academy Actually Mattered? Academy of Management Review, 19, 11–16.
Hamilton, J.D. (2017) Why You Should Never Use the Hodrick-Prescott Filter, Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of California at San Diego.
Harnad, S., Carr, L., Brody, T. and Oppenheim, C. (2003) Mandated online RAE CVs Linked to University Eprint Archives: Enhancing UK Research Impact and Assessment. Accessed 6 August 2017 at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aac4/4bdefdf27a1069cb6f45229ee65d8a56f6c6.pdf.
Hartemink, A.E. (1999) Publish or Perish (1) – Journal Prices and Impact, Bulletin of the International Union of Soil Sciences, 95, 13–17.
Harzing, A.W. (2008a) Reflections on the h-index. Accessed 4 August 2017 at https://harzing.com/publications/white-papers/reflections-on-the-h-index.
Harzing, A.W. (2008b) Google Scholar as a New Data Source for Citation Analysis. Accessed 4 August 2017 at https://harzing.com/publications/white-papers/google-scholar-a-new-data-source-for-citation-analysis.
Harzing, A.W. (2010) The Publish or Perish Book: Your Guide to Effective and Responsible Citation Analysis, Melbourne: Tarma Software Research Pty Ltd.
Harzing, A.W. (2016) Journal Quality List, Harzing.com, 6 February. Accessed 4 August 2017 at http://www.harzing.com/resources/journal-quality-list.
Harzing, A.W. and Van der Wal, R. (2008) A Google Scholar h-Index for Journals: An Alternative Metric to Measure Journal Impact in Economics and Business. Accessed 4 August 2017 at http://www.harzing.com/download/gshindex.pdf.
Havergal, C. (2015) ABS Ranking Reveals ‘World Elite’ of Business Journals, Times Higher Education, 25 February. Accessed 8 August 2017 at https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/abs-ranking-reveals-world-elite-of-business-journals/2018722.article.
Hawkins, R.G., Ritter, L.S. and Walter, I. (1973) What Economists Think of Their Journals, Journal of Political Economy, 81, 1017–1032.
Hendry, D.F. (1980) Econometrics – Alchemy or Science?, Economica, 47, 387–406.
Hendry, D.F. and Ericsson, N.R. (1991) An Econometric Analysis of U.K. Money Demand in Monetary Trends in the United States and the United Kingdom by Milton Friedman and Anna J. Schwartz, American Economic Review, 81, 8–38.
Hiltzik, M. (2015) Are Most Academic Papers Really Worthless? Don’t Trust this Worthless Statistic, Los Angeles Times, 30 November.
Hirsch, J.E. (2005) An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 102, 16569–16572.
Hirsch, J.E. (2007) Does the h-Index Have Predictive Power? Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 104, 19193–19198.
Hitchcock, S., Bergmark, D. and Brody, T. et al. (2002) Open Citation Linking, D-Lib Magazine, 8. Accessed 10 August 2017 at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october02/hitchcock/10hitchcock.html.
Hodrick, R.J. and Prescott, E.C. (1997) Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 29, 1–16.
Holmes, A. (1931) Radioactivity and Earth Movements, Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow, 18, 559–606.
Horn, K. (2009) The Serendipity of Genius, Standpoint, October. Accessed 2 August 2017 at http://www.standpointmag.co.uk/node/2164/full.
Horton, R. (1996) The Lancet Ombudsman, The Lancet, 348, 6.
Hubbard, R. and Armstrong, J.S. (1992) Are Null Results Becoming an Endangered Species in Marketing, Marketing Letters, 3, 127–136.
Interlandi, J. (2006) An Unwelcome Discovery, New York Times Magazine, 22 October.
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium (2001) Initial Sequencing and Analysis of the Human Genome, Nature, 412, 860–921.
Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2005) Why Most Published Research Findings Are False, PLOS Med, 2, e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
Jensen, M. (1978) Some Anomalous Evidence Regarding Market Efficiency, Journal of Financial Economics, 6, 95–101.
Jin, B. (2007) H-Index: An Evaluation Indicator Proposed by Scientist, Science Focus, 1, 8–9.
Jones, M. and Sugden, R. (2001) Positive Confirmation Bias in the Acquisition of Information, Theory and Decision, 50, 59–99.
Jones, M.J., Brinn, T. and Pendlebury, A. (1996) Journal Evaluation Methodologies: A Balanced Response, Omega: International Journal of Management Science, 24, 607–612.
Kaplan, N.R. and Nelson, M.L. (2000) Determining the Publication Impact of a Digital Library, Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 51, 324–339.
Keele List (2006) Rankings of Economic Journals. Accessed 6 August 2017 at www.danielzizzo.com/keele.pdf.
Kemper, K.J. (1991) Pride and Prejudice in Peer Review, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44, 343–345.
Kent, B. (2014) Why Scientists Should Stop Publishing?, 25 April. Accessed 3 August 2017 at http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20140424173116328.
Kerr, S., Tolliver, J. and Petree, D. (1977) Manuscript Characteristics Which Influence Acceptance for Management and Social Science Journals, Academy of Management Journal, 20, 132–141.
Keuzenkamp, H.A. (2000) Probability, Econometrics and Truth: The Methodology of Econometrics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
King, C. (2013) Single-author Papers: A Waning Share of Output, But Still Providing the Tools for Progress, ScienceWatch, September. Accessed 8 August 2017 at http://sciencewatch.com/articles/single-author-papers-waning-share-output-still-providing-tools-progress.
Kinman, G. and Wray, S. (2013) Higher Stress: A Survey of Stress and Well-being Among Staff in Higher Education, University and College Union. Accessed 2 August 2017 at http://www.ucu.org.uk/media/5911/Higher-stress-a-survey-of-stress-and-well-being-among-staff-in-higher-education-Jul-13/pdf/HE_stress_report_July_2013.pdf.
Klein, L.R. (1951) The Life of J.M. Keynes, Journal of Political Economy, 59, 443–451.
Knott, M. (2015) Academic Publications to Become Less Important When Funding University Research, Sydney Morning Herald, 16 November.
Kostoulas, A. (2014) Fake Papers a Symptom of More Serious Problems in Academia. Footnote1, 26 March. Accessed 2 August 2017 at http://footnote1.com/fake-papers-a-symptom-of-more-serious-problems-in-academia/.
Koziol, M. (2016) How Malcolm Turnbull’s Innovation Agenda Failed to Take Flight, Sydney Morning Herald, 18 July.
Kriegeskorte, N. (2011) Open Evaluation (OE): Post-publication Peer Review and Rating, UK Parliament, Parliamentary Session 2010–2011. Accessed 7 August 2017 at https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmsctech/writev/856/m14.htm.
Kristof, N. (2014) Professors, We Need You!, New York Times, 16 February. Kumar, M.N. (2008) A Review of the Types of Scientific Misconduct in Biomedical Research, Journal of Academic Ethics, 6, 211–228.
Kurtz, M.J., Eichhorn, G. and Accomazzi, A. et al. (2000) The NASA Astrophysics Data System: Overview, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 143, 41–59.
Kurtz, M.J., Eichhorn, G. and Accomazzi, A. et al. (2005a) The Bibliometric Properties of Article Readership Information, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56, 111–128.
Kurtz, M.J., Eichhorn, G. and Accomazzi, A. et al. (2005b) Worldwide Use and Impact of the NASA Astrophysics Data System Digital Library, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56, 36–45.
Laband, D.N. and Piette, M.J. (1994) The Relative Impacts of Economics Journals: 1970–1991, Journal of Economic Literature, 32, 640–666.
Labbé, C. and Labbé, D. (2013) Duplicate and Fake Publications in the Scientific Literature: How Many SCIgen Papers in Computer Science?, Scientometrics, 94, 379–396.
LaFollette, M.C. (1992) Stealing into Print: Fraud, Plagiarism and Misconduct in Scientific Publishing, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Laidler, K.J. and King, M.C. (1983) The Development of Transition-state Theory, Journal of Physical Chemistry, 87, 2657–2664.
Larivière, V., Haustein, S. and Mongeon, P. (2015) The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era, PLOS ONE, 10 June, e0127502.
Leamer, E. (1981) The Hit Parade of Economics Articles, in E. Tower (ed.), Economics Reading Lists, Course Outlines, Exams, Puzzles and Problems, Vol. 14, Durham, NC: Eno River Press, 3–54.
Leamer, E. (1983) Let’s Take the Con Out of Econometrics, American Economic Review, 73, 31–43.
Leamer, E. and Leonard, H. (1983) Reporting the Fragility of Regression Estimates, Review of Economics and Statistics, 65, 306–317.
Lee, F.S. (2006) The Ranking Game, Class, and Scholarship in American Mainstream Economics, Australasian Journal of Economics Education, 3, 1–41.
Levelt Committee, Noort Committee and Drenth Committee (2012) Flawed Science: The Fraudulent Research Practices of Social Psychologist Diederik Stapel. Accessed 3 August 2017 at http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:1569964:8/component/escidoc:1569966/Stapel_Investigation_Final_report.pdf.
Leydesdorff, L. and Opthof, T. (2010) Scopus’s Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) versus a Journal Impact Factor Based on Fractional Counting of Citations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 2365–2369.
Line, M.B. (1993) Changes in the Use of Literature with Time Obsolescence Revisited, Library Trends, 41, 665–683.
Lo, W.Y.W. (2011) Soft Power, University Rankings and Knowledge Production: Distinctions Between Hegemony and Self-determination in Higher Education, Comparative Education, 47, 209–222.
Lock, S. (1985) Letters to P.B.S. Fowler, British Medical Journal, 290, 1560.
Locke, J. and Lowe, A. (2000) A Market Test of the Ranking of Accounting Journals: An Australasian Perspective, Working Paper Series No. 68, Waikato University, Department of Accounting, October.
Lowe, D. (2010) All Those Worthless Papers, In the Pipeline Blog, 24 June. Accessed 2 August 2017 at http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2010/06/24/all_those_worthless_papers.
Mackenzie, D. (2006) Breakthrough of the Year: The Poincaré Conjecture – Proved, Science, 314, 1848–1849.
MacRoberts, M.H. and MacRoberts, B.R. (1987) Testing the Ortega Hypothesis: Facts and Artifacts, Scientometrics, 12, 293–295.
MacRoberts, M.H. and MacRoberts, B.R. (1989) Problems of Citation Analysis: A Critical Review, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40, 342–349.
MacRoberts, M.H. and MacRoberts, B.R. (2010) Problems of Citation Analysis: A Study of Uncited and Seldom-cited Influences, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 1–12.
Mahoney, M.J. (1990) Bias, Controversy and Abuse in the Study of the Scientific Publication System, Science, Technology and Human Values, 15, 50–55.
Mahroum, S. (2016) ‘Publish or Perish’: The New Brain Drain in Science, World Economic Forum, 8 November. Accessed 2 August 2017 at https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/publish-or-perish-the-new-brain-drain-in-science.
Martin, L. (2013) Canada’s Political Scholars Fiddle while Rome Burns, The Globe and Mail, 4 June.
Mason, P.M., Steagall, J.W. and Fabritius, M.M. (1992) Publication Delays in Articles in Economics: What to Do about Them?, Applied Economics, 24, 859–874.
Mason, P.M., Steagall, J.W. and Fabritius, M.M. (1997) Economics Journal Rankings by Type of School: Perceptions versus Citations, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 36, 69–79.
McAleer, M. (1994) Sherlock Holmes and the Search for Truth: A Diagnostic Tale, Journal of Economic Survey, 8, 317–370.
McCullough, B.D. and Vinod, H.D. (2003) Verifying the Solution from a Nonlinear Solver: A Case Study, American Economic Review, 93, 873–892.
McRae, T.W. (1974) A Citational Analysis of the Accounting Information Network, Journal of Accounting Research, 12, 80–92.
Meho, L.I. and Yang, K. (2007) Impact of Data Sources on Citation Counts and Rankings of LIS Faculty: Web of Science vs. Scopus and Google Scholar, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2105–2125.
Meltzoff, J. (2005) Ethics in Publication, Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 11, 337–355.
Moed, H.F., Colledge, L. and Reedijk, J. et al. (2012) Citation-based Metrics are Appropriate Tools in Journal Assessment Provided That They Are Accurate and Used in an Informed Way, Scientometrics, 92, 367–376.
Mojon-Azzi, S.M. and Mojon, D.S. (2004) Scientific Misconduct: From Salami Slicing to Data Fabrication, Ophthalmologica, 36, 1–3.
Molinié, A. and Bodenhausen, G. (2010) Bibliometrics as Weapons of Mass Citation, Chimia, 64, 78–89.
Monbiot, G. (2011) Academic Publishers Make Murdoch Look Like a Socialist, The Guardian, 29 August. Accessed 3 August 2017 at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/aug/29/academic-publishers-murdoch-socialist.
Moosa, I.A. (1999) Misinterpreting Gustav Cassel: Origins and Implications for the Contemporary Literature, History of Economics Review, 30, 41–55.
Moosa, I.A. (2011) The Demise of the ARC Journal Ranking Scheme: An Ex Post Analysis of the Accounting and Finance Journals, Accounting and Finance, 51, 809–836.
Moosa, I.A. (2012) The US–China Trade Dispute: Facts, Figures and Myths, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Moosa, I.A. (2013) The Failure of Financial Econometrics: Confirmation and Publication Biases, Journal of Financial Transformation, 36, 45–50.
Moosa, I.A. (2016a) Citations, Journal Ranking and Multiple Authorships: Evidence Based on the Top 300 Papers in Economics, Applied Economics Letters, 24, 175–181.
Moosa, I.A. (2016b) A Critique of the Bucket Classification of Journals: The ABDC List as an Example, Economic Record, 92, 448–463.
Moosa, I.A. (2017a) Covered Interest Parity: The Untestable Hypothesis, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics (forthcoming).
Moosa, I.A. (2017b) Econometrics as a Con Art: Exposing the Limitations and Abuses of Econometrics, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Moosa, I.A. (2017c) The Econometrics of the Environmental Kuznets Curve: An Illustration Using Australian CO2 Emissions, Applied Economics [online]. Accessed 6 August 2017 at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1296552.
Moosa, I.A. (2017d) Blaming Suicide on NASA and Divorce on Margarine: The Hazard of Using Cointegration to Derive Inference on Spurious Correlation, Applied Economics [online]. Accessed 6 August 2017 at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1218434.
Moosa, I.A. (2017e) Futures Crude Oil Prices as Predictors of Spot Prices: Lessons from the Foreign Exchange Market, Working Paper, School of Economics, Finance and Marketing, RMIT.
Moosa, I.A. and Bhatti, R.H. (1999) Some Popular Misconceptions about the Theory and Empirical Testing of Purchasing Power Parity, Journal of International Economic Studies, 13, 147–161.
Moosa, I.A. and Burns, K. (2014) The Unbeatable Random Walk in Exchange Rate Forecasting: Reality or Myth?Journal of Macroeconomics, 40, 69–81.
Moosa, I.A. and Burns, K. (2015) Demystifying the Meese-Rogoff Puzzle, London: Palgrave.
Moosa, I.A. and Li, L. (2017) The Mystery of the Chinese Exchange Rate Regime: Basket or No Basket?, Applied Economics, 49, 349–360.
Moosa, I.A. and Ma, M. (2015) Is the Chinese Currency Undervalued?, International Journal of Economics, 9, 81–99.
Moosa, I.A., Naughton, A. and Li, L. (2009) Exchange Rate Regime Verification: Has China Actually Moved from a Dollar Peg to a Basket Peg?, Economia Internazionale, 62, 41–67.
Mullins, C. (1977) A Guide to Writing and Publishing in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York: Robert E. Krieger.
Murray, G.D. (1988) The Task of a Statistical Referee, British Journal of Surgery, 75, 664–667.
National Innovation & Science Agenda (2015) National Innovation and Science Agenda Report. Accessed 9 August 2017 at https://www.innovation.gov.au/page/national-innovation-and-science-agenda-report.
Neuroskeptic (2013) What’s Wrong With ‘Publish or Perish’? Discover, 28 March. Accessed 2 August 2017 at http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2013/03/28/whats-wrong-with-publish-or-perish/#.WNYHXfmGOUk.
New, J. (2013) Publisher Threatens to Sue Blogger for $1-Billion, Chronicle of Higher Education, 15 May.
Newcombe, R.G. (1987) Towards a Reduction in Publication Bias, British Medical Journal, 295, 656–659.
Nielsen, M. (2009) Three Myths about Scientific Peer Review, Michael Nielsen Blog, 8 January. Accessed 9 August 2017 at http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/three-myths-about-scientific-peer–review/.
November, P. (2004) Seven Reasons Why Marketing Practitioners Should Ignore Marketing Academic Research, Australasian Marketing Journal, 12, 39–50.
Nyhan, B. (2012) Academic Reforms: A Four-part Proposal. Brendan Nyhan Blog, 16 April. Accessed 7 August 2017 at http://www.brendan-nyhan.com/blog/2012/04/academic-reforms-a-four-part-proposal.html.
OECD (2010) Performance-based Funding for Public Research in Tertiary Education Institutions, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Omobowale, A.O. (2014) Peripheral Scholarship and the Context of Foreign Paid Publishing in Nigeria, Current Sociology, 62, 666–684.
Open Science Collaboration (2015) Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science, Science, 349, 943.
Opthof, T. (1997) Sense and Nonsense about the Impact Factor, Cardiovascular Research, 33, 1–7.
Oswald, A.J. (2007) An Examination of the Reliability of Prestigious Scholarly Journals: Evidence and Implications for Decision-makers, Economica, 74, 21–31.
Overhauser, A.W. (1953) Polarization of Nuclei in Metals, Physical Review, 92, 411–415.
Padial, A.A., Nabout, J.C. and Siqueira, T. et al. (2010) Weak Evidence for Determinants of Citation Frequency in Ecological Articles, Scientometrics, 85, 1–12.
Patinkin, D. (1976) Keynes and Econometrics: On the Interaction between the Macroeconomics Revolutions in the Interwar Period, Econometrica, 44, 1091–1123.
Pauly, D. and Stergiou, K.I. (2005) Equivalence of Results from Two Citation Analyses: Thomson ISI’s Citation Index and Google Scholar’s Service, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, December, 33–35.
Peng, R. (2009) Reproducible Research and Biostatistics, Biostatistics, 10, 405–408.
Pesaran, M.H. and Smith, R. (1985) Keynes on Econometrics, in T. Lawson and M.H. Pesaran (eds), Keynes’ Economics: Methodological Issues, London: Croom Helm.
Peters, D.P. and Ceci, S.J. (1985) Peer Review: Beauty Is in the Eye of the Beholder, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 747–775.
Petrolia, D.R. and Hudson, D. (2013) Why is the Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics Not in the Major Citation Indices and Does It Really Matter? Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 45, 381–388.
Petsko, G.A. (2008) Having an Impact (Factor), Genome Biology, 9, 107.
Pettigrew, A.M. (2011) Scholarship with Impact, British Journal of Management, 22, 347–354.
Philp, B. (2012) Research Excellence Framework (REF), Association for Heterodox Economics. Accessed 8 August 2017 at http://hetecon.net/division.php?page=resources&side=research_assessment.
Pierson, F.C. (1959) The Education of American Businessmen: A Study of University-College Programs in Business Administration, New York: McGraw-Hill.
PLOS ONE (n.d.) Journal Information. Accessed 9 August 2017 at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/journal-information.
Plume, A. (2013) Publish or Perish: Maximizing the Impact of your Next Publication, City Graduate School Welcome Event, 18 November. Accessed 1 August 2017 at https://www.city.ac.uk/—data/assets/pdf…/1119-Publish-or-perish-Andrew-Plume.pdf.
Plume, A. and Van Weijen, D. (2014) Publish or Perish? The Rise of the Fractional Author, Research Trends, 30, September.
Porter, L.W. and McKibbin, L.E. (1988) Management Education and Development: Drift or Thrust into the 21st Century? New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pressman, S. (2014) Econ Agonistes: Navigating and Surviving the Publishing Process, in M. Szenberg and L. Ramrattan (eds), Secrets of Economics Editors, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Price, J. (2015) ‘Publish or Perish’ Culture May Be Cut by the PM, The Courier, 17 November. Accessed 8 August 2017 at http://www.thecourier.com.au/story/3497335/publish-or-perish-culture-may-be-cut-by-the-pm/.
Pudovkin, A.I. and Garfield, E. (2012) Rank Normalization of Impact Factors Will Resolve Vanclay’s Dilemma with TRIF: Comments on the Paper by Jerome Vanclay, Scientometrics, 92, 409–412.
Purgathofer, W., Groeller, E. and Feda, M. (1995) WARNING: Beware of VIDEA! Accessed 9 August 2017 at https://users.cg.tuwien.ac.at/wp/videa-paper.html.
Quora (2015) ‘Is Elon Musk Right in Saying Most Academic Papers Are Useless?’, Quora.com, accessed 2 August 2017 at https://www.quora.com/Is-Elon-Musk-right-in-saying-most-academic-papers-are-useless.
Redden, G. (2008) From RAE to ERA: Research Evaluation at Work in the Corporate University, Australian Humanities Review, 45, 7–26. Accessed 8 August 2017 at http://www.australianhumanitiesreview.org/archive/Issue-November-2008/redden.html.
Redner, H. (1987) Pathologies of Science, Social Epistemology, 1, 215–247.
Redner, S. (1998) How Popular is Your Paper? An Empirical Study of the Citation Distribution, European Physical Journal B, 4, 131–134.
Reinstein, A., Hasselback, J.R., Riley, M.E. and Sinason, D.H. (2011) Pitfalls of Using Citation Indices for Making Academic Accounting Promotion, Tenure, Teaching Load, and Merit Pay Decisions, Issues In Accounting Education, 26, 99–133.
RePEc (n.d.) RePEc/IDEAS Rankings. Accessed 6 August 2017 at tps://ideas.repec.org/top/.
Resnik, D.B. (1998) The Ethics of Science: An Introduction, London: Routledge.
Retraction Watch (2017) Why Did Beall’s List of Potential Predatory Publishers Go Dark?, 17 January.
Reuters, T. (2013–16) Journal Citation Reports. Accessed 4 August 2017 at https://www.jisc-collections.ac.uk/Catalogue/Overview/index/1619.
Ricci, C. (2009) Philosophical Clashes: Rethinking Scholarship, Paideusis, 18, 55–59.
Riordan, P. (2015) Innovation Statement: At a Glance, AFR Weekend, 7 December.
Robin, E.D. and Burke, C.M. (1987) Peer Review in Medical Journals, Chest, 2, 252–255.
Roig, M. (2002) Recycling Portions of Text from the Same Author/s Previously Published Papers in Psychology: An Exploratory Study, paper presented at the Second Office of Research Integrity’s Conference on Research Integrity, Bethesda (MD).
Roig, M. (2006) Avoiding Plagiarism, Self-plagiarism, and Other Questionable Writing Practices: A Guide to Ethical Writing. Accessed 3 August 2017 at https://ori.hhs.gov/images/ddblock/plagiarism.pdf.
Roth, M. (2005) Vagaries and Politics of Funding Educational Research, in M. Roth (ed.), Auto/Biography and Auto/Ethnography: Praxis of Research Method, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 301–330.
Rousseau, R. (2006) New Developments Related to the Hirsch Index, Science Focus, 1, 23–25.
Rowley, R. (1988) The Keynes-Tinbergen Exchange in Retrospect, in O.F. Hamouda and J.N. Smithin (eds), Keynes and Public Policy after Fifty Years, Vol. 2, Aldershot, UK and Brookfield, VT, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ryan, C. (2005) The Ranking and Rating of Academics and Journals in Tourism Research, Tourism Management, 26, 657–662.
Salsburg, D.S. (1985) The Religion of Statistics as Practices in Medical Journals, American Statistician, 39, 220–223.
Samuelson, P.A. (1946) Lord Keynes and the General Theory, Econometrica, 14, 187–200.
Samuelson, P. (1994) Self-plagiarism or Fair Use?, Communications of the ACM, 37, 21–25.
Scanes, C.G. (2007) Ethics of Publication: Is Publication an Obligation for Researchers? Poultry Science, 86, 2051–2052.
Scanlon, P.M. (2007) Song from Myself: An Anatomy of Self-plagiarism, Plagiary: Cross-disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, 2, 57–66.
Schloegl, C. and Gorraiz, J. (2010) Comparison of Citation and Usage Indicators: The Case of Oncology Journals, Scientometrics, 82, 567–580.
Schloegl, C. and Gorraiz, J. (2011) Global Usage Versus Global Citation Metrics: The Case of Pharmacology Journals, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 161–170.
Schubert, A. and Glänzel, W. (1983) Statistical Reliability of Comparisons Based on the Citation Impact of Scientific Publications, Scientometrics, 5, 59–74.
Schwartz, B. (1975) Queuing and Waiting: Studies in Social Organization of Access and Delay, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 63–87.
SCIgen (n.d.) SCIgen – An Automatic CS Paper Generator. Accessed 7 August 2017 at https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/archive/scigen/.
Scopus (2017) About Scopus. Accessed 4 August 2017 at https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus.
Scott, S. and Branley, A. (2015) High-profile Researcher Admits Fabricating Scientific Results Published in Major Journals, ABC News, 17 September. Accessed 3 August 2017 at http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-09-17/high-profile-researcher-admits-to-fabricating-scientific-results/6781958.
Seglen, P.O. (1997) Why the Impact Factor of Journals Should Not Be Used for Evaluating Research, British Medical Journal, 314, 498–502.
Seidl, C., Schmidy, U. and Grosche, P. (2002) A Beauty Contest of Referee Processes of Economics Journals: Preliminary Results, Working Paper, Department of Economics, Kiel University.
Shapiro, F.R. (1998) They Published, Not Perished, but Were They Good Teachers, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 73, 835–845.
Shapiro, S. (1985) The Decision to Publish: Ethical Dilemmas, Journal of Chronic Diseases, 38, 365–372.
Shaw, C. (2013) Hundreds of Open Access Journals Accept Fake Science Paper, The Guardian, 4 October.
Sheldrick, G.M. (2008) A Short History of SHELX, Acta Crystallograph A, 64, 112–122.
Shen, C. and Björk, B.C. (2015) ‘Predatory’ Open Access: A Longitudinal Study of Article Volumes and Market Characteristics, BMC Medicine, 13, 230.
Shepherd, P.T. (2007) The Feasibility of Developing and Implementing Journal Usage Factors: A Research Project Sponsored by UKSG, Journal for the Serials Community, 20, 117–123.
Shepherd, P.T. (2011) New COUNTER-based Metrics? Journal Usage Factor and PIRUS, 17 March. Accessed 6 August 2017 at http://www.stm-assoc.org/2011_03_17_COUNTER_Shepherd_New_COUNTER_based_metrics.pdf.
Simon, R.J. (1994) An Effective Journal Editor: Insights Gained from Editing the American Sociological Review, in R.J. Simon and J.J. Fyfe (eds), Editors as Gatekeepers: Getting Published in the Social Sciences, Boston, MA: Rowman and Littlefield.
Simon, R.J., Bakanic, V. and McPhail, C. (1986) Who Complains to Journal Editors and What Happens, Sociological Inquiry, 56, 259–271.
Small, H. (1987) The Significance of Bibliographic References: A Comment on ‘Testing the Ortega Hypothesis: Facts and Artifacts’ by M.H. MacRoberts and B.R. MacRoberts, Scientometrics, 12, 293–341.
Smith, A.G. (2008) Benchmarking Google Scholar with the New Zealand PBRF Research Assessment Exercise, Scientometrics, 74, 309–316.
Smith, P. (1990) Killing the Spirit: Higher Education in America, New York: Viking.
Smith, R. (2006) Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99, 178–182.
Smith, S.D. (2004) Is an Article in a Top Journal a Top Article? Financial Management, 33, 133–149.
Sojka, R.E. and Mayland, H.F. (1993) Driving Science with One Eye on the Peer Review Mirror, in Forum Proceedings: Ethics, Values, and the Promise of Science, San Francisco, 25–26 February.
Sokal, A.D. (1996a) Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity, Social Text, 46/47, 217–252.
Sokal, A.D. (1996b) A Physicist Experiments With Cultural Studies, Lingua Franca, May/June.
Spears, T. (2014) Blinded by Scientific Gobbledygook, Ottawa Citizen, 21 April.
Spears, T. (2017) World’s Main List of ‘Predatory’ Science Publishers Vanishes with No Warning, Ottawa Citizen, 17 January. Accessed 5 August 2017 at http://ottawacitizen.com/storyline/worlds-main-list-of-science-predators-vanishes-with-no-warning.
Spicer, A. and Roulet, T. (2014) Hate the Peer-review Process? Einstein Did Too, The Conversation, 2 June. Accessed 6 August 2017 at http://theconversation.com/hate-the-peer-review-process-einstein-did-too-27405.
Spooner, M. (2014) Universities are Confusing Accountability with Accountancy, University Affairs, 30 April. Accessed 1 August 2017 at http://www.universityaffairs.ca/opinion/in-my-opinion/universities-are-confusing-accountability-with-accountancy/.
Stahel, P.F., Clavien, P.A., Smith, W.R. and Moore, E.E. (2012) Redundant Publications in Surgery: A Threat to Patient Safety? Patient Safety in Surgery, 2, 1–4.
Steele, C., Butler, L. and Kingsley, D. (2006) The Publishing Imperative: The Pervasive Influence of Publication Metrics, Learned Publishing, 19, 277–290.
Sterling, T. (1970) Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance or Vice Versa, in D.E. Morrison and R.E. Henkel (eds), The Significance Tests Controversy: A Reader, London, Butterworths.
Stern, D. (2013) Research Excellence Framework (REF) Review: Uncertainty Measures for Economics Journal Impact Factors, Journal of Economic Literature, 51, 173–189.
Stern, N. (2016) Building on Successes and Learning from Experience: An Independent Review of the Research Excellence Framework. Accessed 8 August 2017 at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/research-excellence-framework-review.
Stewart, W.W. and Feder, N. (1987) The Integrity of the Scientific Literature, Nature, 325, 207–214.
Stone, R. (1978) Keynes, Political Arithmetic and Econometrics, in Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. 64, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Storbacka, K. (2014) Does Publish or Perish Lead to Stylish Rubbish?, Journal of Business Market Management, 7, 289–295.
Storbeck, O. (2011) A Summary of the Bruno Frey Affair, Economics Intelligence, 7 July. Accessed 3 August 2017 at http://olafstorbeck.blogstrasse2.de/?p=949.
Straumsheim, C. (2017) No More ‘Beall’s List’, Scholarly Open Access, Inside Higher Ed, 18 January. Accessed 3 August 2017 at https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/01/18/librarians-list-predatory-journals-reportedly-removed-due-threats-and-politics.
Stringer, M.J., Sales-Pardo, M. and Nunes Amaral, L.A. (2008) Effectiveness of Journal Ranking Schemes as a Tool for Locating Information, PLOS ONE, 3. Accessed 6 August 2017 at http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001683.
Sutter, D. and Pjesky, R. (2007) Where Would Adam Smith Publish Today? The Near Absence of Math-free Research in Top Journals, Economics in Practice, 4, 230–240.
Sykes, C.J. (1988) Profscam: Professors and the Demise of Higher Education, Washington, DC: Regency Gateway.
Taleb, N.N. (2009) Ten Principles for a Black Swan Proof World, Financial Times, 7 April. Accessed 2 August 2017 at https://www.ft.com/content/5d5aa24e-23a4-11de-996a-00144feabdc0.
Tam, P. (2007) Publish-or-Perish Culture at Universities Harms Public Good, Ottawa Citizen, 3 November.
Tertiary Education Commission (n.d.) Performance-Based Research Fund. Accessed 9 August 2017 at http://www.tec.govt.nz/funding/funding-and-performance/funding/fund-finder/performance-based-research-fund/.
The Australian (2011) End of an ERA: Journal Rankings Dropped, 30 May. Accessed 8 August 2017 at http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/end-of-an-era-journal-rankings-dropped/news-story/923b52a699c02a659bad88c20157fc0d.
Tian, M., Su, Y. and Ru, X. (2016) Perish or Publish in China: Pressures on Young Chinese Scholars to Publish in Internationally Indexed Journals, MDI Publications, 1 April. file://ntapprdfs01n02.rmit.internal/eh0/E84260/Configuration/Desktop/publications–04–00009.pdf.
Tijdink, J.K., Bouter, L.M. and Veldkamp, C.L.S. et al. (2016) Personality Traits are Associated with Research Misbehavior in Dutch Scientists: A Cross-sectional Study, PLOS ONE, September.
Tijdink, J.K., Verbeke, R. and Smulders, Y.M. (2014) Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9, 64–71.
Ting, J. (2016) Publish or Perish Results in Dodgy Work, Australian Financial Review, 6 September. Accessed 5 August 2017 at http://www.afr.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/publish-or-perish-results-in-dodgy-work-20150906-gjg3db.
Tol, R.S.J. (2009) The h-Index and its Alternatives: An Application to the 100 Most Prolific Economists, Scientometrics, 80, 317–324.
Truth, F. (2012) Pay Big to Publish Fast: Academic Journal Rackets, Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 10, 54–105.
Tsay, M.Y. (1998) Library Journal Use and Citation Half-life in Medical Science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 1283–1292.
Turner, G. (2016) Four Myths: The Inconvenient Truth about Higher Education Funding, The Weekend Australian, 24 February.
University and College Union (2008) Archive: RAE 2008. Accessed 8 August 2017 at https://www.ucu.org.uk/rae2008.
Vanclay, J.K. (2012) Impact Factor: Outdated Artefact or Stepping-stone to Journal Certification?, Scientometrics, 92, 211–138.
Van Dalen, H. and Henkens, K. (2012) Intended and Unintended Consequences of a Publish-or-Perish Culture: A Worldwide Survey, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 1282–1293.
Vanpaemel, W., Vermorgen, M., Deriemaecker, L. and Storms, G. (2015) Are We Wasting a Good Crisis? The Availability of Psychological Research Data after the Storm, Collabra, 1, 1–5.
Vickery, B. (1969) Indicators of the Use of Periodicals, Journal of Librarianship, 1, 170–181.
Vidal, C. (1990) Las Ondas Químicas, Mundo Cientifico, 10, 184–192.
Von Elm, E., Poglia, G., Walder, B. and Tramèr, M.R. (2004) Different Patterns of Duplicate Publication: An Analysis of Articles Used in Systematic Reviews, Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 974–980.
Walker, A. (2015) Shift Away from ‘Publish or Perish’ Puts the Public Back into Publication, The Conversation, 4 December.
Wall, H.J. (2009) Don’t Get Skewed Over by Journal Ranking, B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 9, 1–12.
Wallace, F. and Perri, T. (2016) Economists Behaving Badly: Publications in Predatory Journals, MPRA Papers, No. 73075.
Wan, J.K., Hua, P.H., Rousseau, R. and Sun, X.K. (2010) The Journal Download Immediacy Index (DII): Experiences Using a Chinese Fulltext Database, Scientometrics, 82, 555–566.
Wanjek, C. (2015) Suspect Science: The Top 5 Retracted Papers of 2015, Live Science, 30 December. Accessed 8 August 2017 at http://www.livescience.com/53228-top-retracted-science-papers-2015.html.
Wasserman, L. (2012) A World Without Referees, ISBA Bulletin, 19, 7–8.
Weber, R.P. and Stevenson, W.C. (1981) Evaluation of Accounting Journal and Department Quality, Accounting Review, 56, 596–612.
Weil, S. (2014) Fake Papers a Symptom of More Serious Problems in Academia, Footnote1, 26 March. Accessed 8 August 2017 at http://www.footnote1.com/why-biomedical-research-has-a-reproducibility-problem/.
Wicherts, J.M., Borsboom, D., Kats, J. and Molenaar, D. (2006) The Poor Availability of Psychological Research Data for Reanalysis, American Psychologist, 61, 726–728.
Wilson, L. (1942) The Academic Man: A Study in the Sociology of a Profession, New York: Oxford University Press.
Woods, R.H. (1998) Single vs. Co-authored and Multiple-authored Articles: The Views of CHRIE Educators on their Value, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Education, 10, 53–56.
Woods, R.H., Youn, H. and Johanson, M.M. (2010) Single vs. Co-authored and Multi-Authored Research Articles: Evaluating the Views and Opinions of ICHRIE Scholars, International CHRIE Conference-Refereed Track, Paper No. 11. Accessed 6 August 2017 at http://scholarworks.umass.edu/refereed/CHRIE_2010/Saturday/11.
Wrege, C.D. and Perroni, A.G. (1974) Taylor’s Pig-Tale: A Historical Analysis of Frederick W. Taylor’s Pig-iron Experiments, Academy of Management Journal, 17, 6–27.
Wu, J., Hao, Q. and Yao, M.Y.M. (2009) Rankings of Academic Journals in Accounting, Finance and Information System: Perception from the College Chairpersons, International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 17, 66–105.
Xia, J., Harmon, J.L. and Connolly, K.G. et al. (2015) Who Publishes in ‘Predatory’ Journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 1406–1417.
Zeff, S.A. (1996) A Study of Academic Research Journals in Accounting, Accounting Horizons, 10, 158–177.
Zuckerman, W. and Merton, R. (1971) Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalization, Structure and Functions of the Referee System, Minerva, 9, 66–100.