The U.S. Supreme Court and Racial Minorities
Two Centuries of Judicial Review on Trial
Leslie F. Goldstein
Extract
Summarizes 200 years of discrimination and anti-discrimination federal policy toward blacks, Indians, Asians, Hispanics. Unveils apparent judicial review pattern: Court can and often does check abuses of racial minorities by state- and territorial-level governments, and abuses of power by administrative officials. Court has hardly ever declared an act of Congress unconstitutional on the grounds that it harmed rights of a racial minority, but has used Just Compensation Clause to demand recompense for Indian tribes. As to a given minority, Court was not always protective, but on the whole judicial review was more helpful than not. President too was important in protecting minority rights, both as enforcer and in persuading/blocking Congress. The evolution of rights of Hispanics, blacks, and Asians, respectively, built upon successes by the other two. The presidents most supportive of blacks’ rights came to power either elected by a minority—Lincoln—or by presidential death: TR, Truman, LBJ. KEY WORDS: Judicial review Minority rights Hughes Court Fuller Court Marshall Court Warren Court
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.