Semiotic perspectives on legal practice involve three major subjects: the citizen’s mindset, the structures of law’s practice, and its discourse embedded in a master-narrative. Tendencies in modern law focus on the mind of a rule-following citizen in parallel with brain research activities and no longer solely as a moral instance. Law’s practice becomes, in that light, a matter of brain stalking. The structure of legal practice depends today more than ever on the case and in particular the speech character of cases. That is highlighted in the frame of e-communication, the many uses of smart phones on the street and of the cyber-story as its recent history. Finally, legal discourse is, like all professional discourses, embedded in a master-narrative. Features of that narrative are anchored in a post-modern mentality. A comparison of three master-narratives delivers insight in often-conflicting attitudes, which originate when one discourse must function in more than one master-narrative: a situation that occurs in Occidental law. Keywords Stalking the brain, Legal practice, Cases, Cyber-connectivity, Streets, Smart phones, Conflicting Narratives
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.