How Law’s Claims Relate to Law’s Aims
Chapter 4: The rule of law and the law of rules
Legal positivism’s dissection of law from justice removed the life from the phenomenon it was examining. What was lost was an understanding of what exactly law’s claim about its relationship to justice is, why that claim is made, and the work which that claim is doing. Justice is integral to the interpretation, expression and critique of legal rules. Shallow justice is intrinsic to judicial decision-making, whether the application of the rule seems plain or contestable. Laws seek to implement conceptions of deep justice. True justice judges the rules and the conceptions of deep justice which they express. The freedom which law promises is important, but is best understood not as a separate good from justice. Governing by means of rules is about both giving subjects an area of immunity from the power of others and about obliging subjects to act in certain ways towards one another.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.