Show Less
You do not have access to this content

Improving Performance Appraisal at Work

Evolution and Change

Aharon Tziner and Edna Rabenu

Compiling extensive research findings with real insights from the business world, this must-read book on performance appraisal explores its evolution from the classic appraisal to its current form, and the methodology behind its progression. Looking forward, Aharon Tziner and Edna Rabenu emphasize that well-conducted appraisals combine a mixture of classic and current, and are here to stay.
Show Summary Details
This content is available to you


Aharon Tziner and Edna Rabenu

Abbott, J.R., and Bernardin, J.R. (1983). The development of a scale of self-efficacy for giving performance feedback. Unpublished manuscript, Florida Atlantic University.
Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–99). New York: Academic Press.
Adler, S. (2015). Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of Society for Industrial and Organizational Society (SIOP), Philadelphia, PA.
*Adler, S., Campion, M., and Colquitt, A. et al. (2016). Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(02), 219–52. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Accessed February 12, 2018 at
Aguinis, H. (2009). An expanded view of performance management. In J.W. Smither and M. London (eds), Performance Management: Putting Research into Action (pp. 1–43). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Aguinis, H. (2013). Performance Management (3rd edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Aguinis, H., and Edwards, J.R. (2014). Methodological wishes for the next decade and how to make wishes come true. Journal of Management Studies, 51(1), 143–74.
Aguinis, H., and Pierce, C.A. (2008). Enhancing the relevance of organizational behavior by embracing performance management research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(1), 139–45.
Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R.K., and Joo, H. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organizational Research Methods, 16(2), 270–301.
Albertson, O.A., and Lueg, R. (2014). The balanced scorecard’s missing link to compensation: A literature review and agenda for future research. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 10, 431–65.
Allen, N.J., and Meyer, J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18.
Altman, S., Valenzi, E., and Hodgetts, R.M. (2013). Organizational Behavior: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Antonioni, D. (1994). The effects of feedback accountability on upward appraisal ratings. Personnel Psychology, 47, 349–56.
Armstrong, M., and Baron, A. (2002). Strategic HRM: The Key to Improved Business Performance. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel & Development.
Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F.O., Seidu, E.M., and Otaye, L.E. (2012). Impact of high-performance work systems on individual- and branch-level performance: Test of a multilevel model of intermediate linkages. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 287–300.
Ashauer, S.A. (2010). An ‘uneasy look at performance appraisal’: Beliefs about performance appraisal outcomes, cognitive appraisals, and emotions as antecedents of upward rating distortion Dissertation, University of Missouri – St Louis. Accessed February 12, 2018 at
Ashkanasy, N.M., and Dorris, A.B. (2018) Organizational culture and climate. In D.S. Ones, N. Anderson, C. Viswesvaran, and H.K. Sinangil. The Sage handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology (2nd edition), Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, p.187–205.
Asmub, B. (2008). Performance appraisal interviews. Preference organization in assessment sequences. Journal of Business Communication, 45(4), 408–29. Ball, K.S. (2001). The use of human resource information systems: A survey. Personnel Review, 30(6), 677–93.
Balzer, W.K., and Sulsky, L.M. (1992). Halo and performance appraisal research: A critical examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 975–85.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanisms in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 127–47.
Barankay, I. (2011). Gender differences in productivity responses to performance ratings: Evidence from a randomized workplace experiment. Mimeo, University of Pennsylvania.
Barling, J., Wade, B., and Fullagar, C. (1990). Predicting employee commitment to company and union: Divergent models. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 49–61.
Barnes, C.M., Hollenbeck, J.R., and Jundt, D.K. (2011). Mixing individual incentives and group incentives: Best of both worlds or social dilemma? Journal of Management, 37(6), 1611–35.
Barry, L., Garr, S., and Liakopoulos, A. (2014). Performance management in broken replace ‘rank and yank’ with coaching and development. In Deloitte (ed.), Global Human Capital Trends: Engaging the 21st Century Workforce (pp.45–52). Accessed 6 February 2018 at
Bartram, D. (2007). Increasing validity with forced-choice criterion measure formats. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 263–72.
Bauer, T.N., and Green, S.G. (1996). Development of leader–member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1538–67.
Beatty, R., and Schneier, C. (1977). Personnel Administration: An Experiential Skill-building Approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Becker, H. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32–42.
Beehr, T.A., Taber, T.D., and Walsh, J.T. (1980). Perceived mobility channels: Criteria for intraorganizational job mobility. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26(2), 250–64.
Bell, B.S., and Kozlowski, S.W. (2002). A typology of virtual teams implications for effective leadership. Group and Organization Management, 27(1), 14–49.
Bennett, N., and Lemoine, G.J. (2014). What a difference a word makes: Understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Business Horizons, 57(3), 311–17.
Benson, P.G., Buckley, R.M., and Hall, S. (1988). The impact of rating scale format on rater accuracy: An appraisal of the mixed standard scale. Journal of Management, 14(3), 415–23.
Bernardin, H.J., and Beatty, R.W. (1984). Performance Appraisal: Assessing Human Behavior at Work. Boston, MA: Kent.
Bernardin, H.J., and Buckley, M.R. (1981). Strategies in rater training. Academy of Management Review, 6(2), 205–12.
Bernardin, H.J., and Pence, E.C. (1980). Effects of rater training: Creating new response sets and decreasing accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 60–66.
Bernardin, H.J., and Smith, P.C. (1981). A clarification of some issues regarding the development and use of behaviorally anchored rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 458–63.
Bernardin, H.J., and Villanova, P. (2005). Research streams in rater self-efficacy. Group and Organization Management, 30, 61–88.
Bernardin, H.J., Cooke, D.K. and Villanova, P. (2000). Conscientiousness and agreeableness as predictors of rating leniency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 232–4.
Bernardin, H.J., Orban, J., and Carlyle, J. (1981). Performance rating as a function of trust in appraisal and rater individual differences. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of The Academy of Management, 311–15.
Bernardin, H.J., Tyler, C.L. and Villanova, P. (2009). Rating level and accuracy as a function of rater personality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 300–310.
Birati, A., Moualem, H., and Katz, G. et al. (2006). Executive pay: Incentive to perform or a free ride? Man and Work (Israel), 14, 6–26.
Biro, M.M. (2016). Wearable technology: A powerful HR tool. Entrepreneur Network, May 18. Accessed February 8, 2018 at
Bjerke, D.G., Cleveland, J.N., Morrison, R.R., and Wilson, W.C. (1987). Officer Fitness Report Evaluation Study (Navy Personnel Research and Development Center Report, TR 88–4). San Diego, CA: NPRDC.
Blanz, F. (1965). A new merit rating method. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Stockholm.
Blanz, F., and Ghiselli, E.E. (1972). The mixed standard scale: A new rating system. Personnel Psychology, 25, 185–99.
Bobko, P., and Colella, A. (1994). Employee reactions to performance standards: A review and research propositions. Personnel Psychology, 47, 1–29.
Borman, W.C. (1978). Exploring upper limits of reliability and validity in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 135–44.
Borman, W.C. (1979). Format and training effects on rating accuracy and rater errors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 410–21.
Borman, W.C., and Motowidlo, S.J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt and W. Borman (eds), Personnel Selection in Organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Borman, W.C., Buck, D.E., and Hanson, M.A. et al. (2001). An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 965–73.
Borman, W.C., Kubisiak, U.C., Grossman, M.R. and Darr, W. (2015). Development and field test of Computer Adaptive Rating Scales (CARS) for the Canadian Forces. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of Society for Industrial and Organizational Society (SIOP), Philadelphia, PA.Bouskila-Yam, O., and Kluger, A.N. (2011). Strength-based performance appraisal and goal setting. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 137–47.
Bowen, D.E., and Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM–firm performance linkages: The role of ‘strength’ of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29, 203–21.
Bowen, D.E., and Waldman, D.A. (1999). Customer-driven employee performance. In D.R. Ilgen and E.D. Pulakos (eds), The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation and Development (pp. 154–91). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bracken, D.W., and Rose, D.S. (2011). When does 360-degree feedback create behavior change? And how would we know it when it does? Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 183–92.
Brett, J.F., and Atwater, L.E (2001). 360º feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 930–42.
Briken, K., Chillas, S., Krzywdzinski, M., and Marks, A. (eds) (2017). Labour process theory and the new digital workplace. In The New Digital Workplace: How New Technologies Revolutionise Work (pp. 1–13). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brockner, J. (1988). Self-esteem at Work: Research, Theory, and Practice. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books/DC Heath and Co.
Brown, M., and Benson, J. (2005). Managing to overload? Work overload and performance appraisal processes. Group and Organization Management, 30, 99–124.
Bryson, B., and Read, J.L. (2009). Total Engagement: Using Games and Virtual Worlds to Change the Way People Work and Businesses Compete. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Buckingham, M., and Goodall, A. (2015). Reinventing performance management. Harvard Business Review, April, 40–50.
Budworth, M.H., Latham, G.P., and Manroop, L. (2015). Looking forward to performance improvement: A field test of the feedforward interview for performance management. Human Resource Management, 54(1), 45–54.
Burns, T., and Stalker, G.M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock.
Campbell, J.D., Garfinkel, R.B., and Moses, L. (1996). Strategies for success in measuring performance. HR Magazine, 41, 98.
Campbell, J.P. (1999). The definition and measurement of performance in the New Age. In D.R. Ilgen and E.D. Pulakos (eds), The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation and Development (pp. 339–429). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Campbell, J.P., Dunnette, M., Arvey, R., and Hellervik, L. (1973). The development and evaluation of behaviorally based rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 15–22.
Campion, M.C., Campion, E.D., and Campion, M.A. (2015). Improvements in performance management through the use of 360 feedback. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(01), 85–93.
Cannon-Bowers, J.A., and Bowers, C. (2011). Team development and functioning. In S. Zedeck (ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol 1: Building and Developing the Organization (pp. 597–650). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
*Cappelli, P., and Tavis, A. (2016). The performance management revolution. Harvard Business Review, October. Accessed February 6, 2018 at
Cardy, R.L., and Dobbins, G.H. (1994). Performance Appraisal: Alternative Perspectives. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing.
Carroll, S.J., and Schneier, C.E. (1982). Performance Appraisal and Review Systems: The Identification, Measurement and Development of Performance in Organizations. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Cascio, W.F. (2000). Managing a virtual workplace. The Academy of Management Executive, 14(3), 81–90.
Catano, V.M., Darr, W., and Campbell, C.A. (2007). Performance appraisal of behavior-based competencies: A reliable and valid procedure. Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 201–30.
Cawley, B.D., Keeping, L.M., and Levy, P.E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 615–33.
Chang, A., Bordia, P., and Duck, J. (2003). Punctuated equilibrium and linear progression: Toward a new understanding of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 106–17.
Cherniak-Hai, L., and Rabenu, E. (2017). Retrospective on Work Relationships: Implications for the New Era Workplace. 125th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association (APA), Washington, DC [poster].
Chiles, A.M., and Zorn, T.E. (1995). Empowerment in organizations: Employees’ perceptions of the influences on empowerment.Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23(1), 1–25.
Church, A.H. (1985). From both sides now, performance appraisals: Political tools or effective measures. The Industrial Organizational Psychologist, 33, 57–64.
Cleveland, J.N., and Murphy, K.R. (1992). Analyzing performance appraisal as goal-directed behavior. In G. Ferris and K. Rowland (eds), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Vol. 10, pp. 121–85). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Cleveland, J.N., Murphy, K.R., and Lim, A.S. (2007). Feedback phobia? Why employees do not want to give or receive it. In J. Langan-Fox, C. Cooper and R. Kilmoski (eds), Research Companion to the Dysfunctional Workplace: Management Challenges and Symptoms (pp. 168–86). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Cleveland, J.N., Murphy, K.R., and Williams, R.E. (1989). Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 130–35.
Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 323–37.
Collins English Dictionary (10th edition) (2012). Organizational culture. Accessed May 9, 2017 at
Colquitt, J.A. (2004). Does the justice of the one interact with the justice of the many? Reactions to procedural justice in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 633–46.
Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., and Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59, 501–28.
Cooper, W. (1981). Ubiquitous halo. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 218–44.
Culbert, S.A., and Rout, L. (2010). Get Rid of the Performance Review!: How Companies Can Stop Intimidating, Start Managing – and Focus on What Really Matters. New York: Business Plus.
Culbertson, S.S., Krome, L.R., and McHenry, B.J. et al. (2013). Performance appraisals: Mend them, don’t end them. In M.A. Paludi (ed.), Psychology for Business Success (Vol. 4, pp. 35–51). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
Cunningham, L. (2015). In big move, Accenture will get rid of annual performance reviews and rankings. Washington Post, July 21. Accessed February 14, 2018 at
Daft, R. (2015). Organization Theory and Design. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Daggett, M., O’Brien, K., Hurley, M., and Hannon, D. (2017). Predicting team performance through human behavioral sensing and quantitative workflow instrumentation. In I.L. Nunes (ed.), Advances in Human Factors and System Interactions: Proceedings of the AHFE 2016 International Conference on Human Factors and System Interactions, July 27–31, 2016.
Dalton, K., and Druker, J. (2012). Transferring HR concepts and practices within multi-national corporations in Romania: The management experience. European Management Journal, 30(6), 588–602.
Dansereau, F., Cho, J., and Yammarino, F.J (2006). Avoiding the ‘fallacy of the wrong level’: A within and between analysis (WABA) approach. Group and Organization Management, 31, 536–77.
Davis, D.D., and Dickinson, T.L. (1987). Organizational and contextual determinants of perceived utility of performance appraisals. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association, New York.
Day, D.V., and Sulsky, L.M. (1995). Effects of frame-of-reference training and information configuration on memory organization and rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 158–67.
DeChurch, L.A., and Mesmer-Magnus, J.R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective work team: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 32–53.
De Haas, M., and Kleingeld, A. (1999). Multilevel design of performance measurement systems: Enhancing strategic dialogue throughout the organization. Management Accounting Research, 10(3), 233–61.
Delery, J.E., and Doty, D.H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 802–35.
Den Hartog, D.N., Boselie, P., and Paauwe, J. (2004). Performance management: A model and research agenda. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 556–69.
DeNisi, A.S. (1996). Cognitive Approach to Performance Appraisal: A Program of Research. New York: Taylor and Francis.
DeNisi, A.S. (2012). Managing performance to change behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 31, 262–76.
DeNisi, A.S., and Gonzalez, J.A. (2004). Design performance appraisal systems to improve performance. In E.A. Locke (ed.), The Blackwell Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior (pp. 60–72). Oxford: Blackwell.
DeNisi, A.S., and Peters, L.H. (1996). Organization of information in memory and the performance appraisal process: Evidence from the field. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 717–37.
DeNisi, A.S., and Pritchard, R.D. (2006). Performance appraisal, performance management and improving individual performance: A motivational framework. Management and Organization Review, 2(2), 253–77.
*DeNisi, A.S. and Murphy, K. R. (2017). Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress?  Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 421–433.
*DeNisi, A.S., and Smith, C.E. (2014). Performance appraisal, performance management, and firm-level performance: A review, a proposed model, and new directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 127–79.
DeNisi, A.S., Robbins, T., and Cafferty, T.P. (1989). Organization of information used for performance appraisals: Role of diary keeping. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 124–9.
De Pater, I.E., Van Vianen, A.E., Bechtoldt, M.N., and Klehe, U.C. (2009). Employees’ challenging job experiences and supervisors. Personnel Psychology, 62(2), 297–325.
DeVaro, J. (2006). Strategic promotion tournaments and worker performance. Management Journal, 27, 721–40.
DeVoe, S.E., and Iyengar, S.S. (2004). Managers’ theories of subordinates: A cross-cultural examination of manager perceptions of motivation and appraisal of performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93(1), 47–61.
De Wit, F.R., Greer, L.L., and Jehn, K.A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 360–90.
Dierdorff, E.C., Surface, E.A., and Brown, K.G. (2010). Frame-of-reference training effectiveness: Effects of goal orientation and self-efficacy on affective, cognitive, skill-based, and transfer outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1181–91.
Dipboye, R.L., and Pontbriand, R. (1981). Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(2), 248–51.
Djurdjevic, E. (2013). The effects of social contextual factors on rater motivation and performance ratings. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Accessed 6 February 2018 at
Dorfman, P.W., Stephan, W.G., and Loveland, J. (1986). Performance appraisal behaviors: Supervisor perception and subordinate reactions. Personal Psychology, 39, 579–97.
Doty, D.H., and Glick, W.H. (1994). Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Academy of Management Review, 19, 230–51.
Dresner, H. (2008). The Performance Management Revolution: Business Results Through Insight and Action. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Drexler, J.A. Jr., Beehr, T.A., and Stetz, T.A. (2001). Peer appraisals: Differentiation of individual performance on group tasks. Human Resource Management, 40(4), 333–45.
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset. New York: Random House.
Eden, D. (1990). Pygmalion in Management: Productivity as a Self-fulfilling Prophecy. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.
Elkington, J. (1999). Cannibals with Forks. Oxford: Capstone.
Erhard, W., and Jensen, M.C. (2017). Putting integrity into finance: A purely positive approach. Capitalism and Society, 12, 1–91.
Ezekiel, O. and Shankar, O. (2005). International management. Ra’anana, IL: Open University of Israel. [in Hebrew]
Facteau, J.D., and Craig, S.B. (2001). Are performance appraisal rating sources comparable? Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 215–27.
Feldman, J.M. (1981). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 127–48.
Ferris, G.R., Judge, T.A., Rowland, K.M., and Fitzgibbons, D.E. (1994). Subordinate influence and the performance evaluation process: Test of a model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(1), 101–35.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–40.
Fisicaro, S.A. (1988). A reexamination of the relationship between halo error and accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 239–44.
Fitz-Gibbon, C.T. (ed.) (1990). Introduction and overview. Performance Indicators (Vol. 2, pp. 1–4). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Fletcher, C. (1997). Appraisal Routes to Improved Performance (2nd edition). London: Chartered Institute of Personnel Development.
Fletcher, C., and Perry, E.L. (2002). Performance appraisal and feedback: A consideration of national culture and a review of contemporary research and future trends. In N. Anderson, D.S. Ones, H.K. Sinangil and C. Viswesvaran (eds), Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 1, 127–44). London: Sage.
Flint, D.H. (1999). The role of organizational justice in multi-source performance appraisal: Theory-based applications and directions for research. Human Resource Management Review, 9(1), 1–20.
Folger, R., Konovsky, M.A., and Cropanzano, R. (1992). A due process metaphor for performance appraisal. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 129–77.
Frayne, C.A., and Latham, G.P. (1987). Application of social training theory to employer self-management of attendance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 387–92.
Fried, Y., Tiegs, R.B., and Bellamy, A.R. (1992). Personal and interpersonal predictors of supervisors’ avoidance of evaluating subordinates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 462–68.
Fry, L. (1982). Technology-structure research: Three critical issues. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 532–52.
Gabris, G.T., and Ihrke, D.M. (2001). Does performance appraisal contribute to heightened levels of employee burnout? The results of one study. Public Personnel Management, 30(2), 157–72.
Gelfand, M.J., Erez, M., and Aycan, Z. (2007). Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 479–514.
Gersick, C.J. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9–41.
Giles, W.F., and Mossholder, K.W. (1990). Employee reactions to contextual and session components of performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4), 371–7.
Gilliland, S.W., and Langdon, J.C. (1998). Creating performance management systems that promote perceptions of fairness. In J.W. Smither (ed.), Performance Appraisal: State of the Art in Practice (pp. 209–43). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Goffin, R.D., Gellatly, I.R., and Paunonen, S.V. et al. (1996). Criterion validation of two approaches to performance appraisal: The behavioral observation scale and the relative percentile method. Journal of Business and Psychology, 11, 23–33.
Goldstein, A.P., and Sorcher, M. (1974). Changing Supervisor Behavior. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
*Goler, L., Gale, J., and Grant, A. (2016). Let’s not kill performance evaluations yet. Harvard Business Review, 94(11), 90–94.Accessed February 4, 2018 at
Gorman, C.A., and Meriac, J.P. (2015). Summary abstract: It’s okay to do rating format research again (symposium). Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of Society for Industrial and Organizational Society (SIOP), Philadelphia, PA.
Gorman, C.A., Meriac, J.P, Ray, J., and Roddy, T. (2015). A survey of rater training programs in U.S. organizations. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of Society for Industrial and Organizational Society (SIOP), Philadelphia, PA.
Grubb, T. (2007). Performance appraisal reappraised: It’s not all positive. Journal of Human Resources Education, 1(1), 1–22.
Hackman, J.R. (1976). Group influences on individuals. In M. Dunnette (ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Hackman, J.R., and Oldham, G.R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–79.
Hall, D.T. (2004). The protean career: A quarter-century journey. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 1–13.
Harden, R.T.M., Stevenson, M., Downie, W.W., and Wilson, G.M. (1975). Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. British Medical Journal, 1(5955), 447–51.
Harris, M.M. (1994). Rater motivation in the performance appraisal context: A theoretical framework. Journal of Management, 20(4), 737–56.
Harris, M.M., and Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self–supervisor, self–peer, and peer–supervisor rating. Personnel Psychology, 41, 43–62.
Helmer, R., Blanchonette, I., and Mestrovic, M. et al. (2012). Wild monitoring: Linking performance, physiology and biomechanics live. In ISBS Conference Proceedings Archive, 1(1), 227–30.
Helmer, R., Mestrovic, M., and Taylor, K. et al. (2010). Physiological tracking, wearable interactive systems and human performance. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence (pp. 57–62).
Heneman, H.G. (1974). Comparisons of self- and superior ratings of managerial performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 638–42.
Henri, J.F. (2006). Organizational culture and performance measurement systems. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 31, 77–103.
Hesketh, B., and Neal, A. (1999). Technology and performance. In D.R. Ilgen and E.D. Pulakos (eds), The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation and Development (pp. 21–55). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Heslin, P.A., VandeWalle, D., and Latham, G.P. (2006). Keen to help? Managers’ implicit person theories and their subsequent employee coaching. Personnel Psychology, 59(4), 871–902.
Hoffman, B.J., Gorman, C.A., and Blair, C.A. et al. (2012). Evidence for the effectiveness of an alternative multisource performance rating methodology. Personnel Psychology, 65, 531–63.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival. London: McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).
Horney, N., Pasmore, B., and O’Shea, T. (2010). Leadership agility: A business imperative for a VUCA world. People and Strategy, 33(4), 32–8.
House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., and Javidan, M. et al. (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Huselid, M.A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635–72.
Ilgen, D.R. (2017) Gender issues in performance appraisal: A discussion of O’Leary and Hansen. In Landy, F., Zedeck, S., and Cleveland, J. (eds). Performance Measurement and Theory (pp. 219–30). New York: Routledge (Taylor and Francis).
Ilgen, D.R., Peterson, R.B., Martin, B.A., and Boeschen, D.A. (1981). Supervisor and subordinate reactions to performance appraisal sessions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28(3), 311–30.
Illies, R, and Judge, T.A. (2005). Goal regulation across time: The effects of feedback and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 453–67.
Ingalls, E.A., Meriac, J.P., Hill, S., and Slifka, J.S (2015). User reactions and rating scales: An experimental comparison. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of Society for Industrial and Organizational Society (SIOP), Philadelphia, PA.
Iqbal, M.Z., Akbar, S., and Budhwar, P. (2014). Effectiveness of performance appraisal: An integrated framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(4), 510–33.
Iqbal, N., Anwar, S., and Haider, N. (2015). Effects of leadership style on employee performance. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 5, 146.
Ivancevich, J.M. (1980). A longitudinal study of behavioral expectation scales: Attitude and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 139–40.
Jackson, S.E., and Schuler, R.S. (1995). Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 237–64.
Jackson, S.E., Schuler, R.S., and Jiang, K. (2014). An aspirational framework for strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 1–56.
Jawahar, I.M. (2005). Do raters consider the influence of situational factors on observed performance when evaluating performance? Evidence from three experiments. Group and Organization Management, 30(1), 6–42.
Jawahar, I.M., and Williams, C.R. (1997). Where all the children are above average: The performance appraisal purpose effect. Personnel Psychology, 50(4), 905–25.
Jiang, K., Lepak, D.P., and Han, K. (2012). Clarifying the construct of human resource systems: Relating human resource management to employee performance. Human Resource Management Review, 22(2), 73–85.
Johnson, M.K., Rowatt, W.C. and Petrini, L. (2011). A new trait on the market: Honesty–Humility as a unique predictor of job performance ratings. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 857–62.
Judge, T.A., and Bono, J.E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits – self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability – with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80–92.
Judge, T.A., and Ferris, G.R. (1993). Social context of performance evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 80–105.
Kaczka, E., and Kirk, R. (1968). Managerial climate, work groups, and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 1096–112.
Kane, J.S. (1994). A model of volitional rating behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 4(3), 283–310.
Kane, J.S. (1996). The conceptualization and representation of total performance effectiveness. Human Resource Management Review, 6(2), 123–45.
Kane, J.S., and Lawler, E.E. (1979). Performance appraisal effectiveness: Its assessment and determinants. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 425–78.
Kaplan, A., Fruchter, D., Stadler, M., and Golden, N. (2002). Appraise them by their performance. Status, 130, 18–24 [in Hebrew].
Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, Sept.–Oct., 71–9.
Kelley, H.H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–28.
Klein, K.J., Dansereau, F., and Hall, R.J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19, 195–229.
Kleingeld, A., Van Mierlo, H., and Arends, L. (2011). The effect of goal setting on group performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1289–304.
Kluger, A.N., and DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–84.
Kluger, A.N., and Nir, D. (2009). The feedforward interview. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 235–46.
Knauft, E.B. (1948). Construction and use of weighted checklist rating scales for two industrial situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 63–70.
Komaki, J.L. (1998). When performance improvement is the goal: A new set of criteria for criteria. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(2), 263–80.
Koriat, N., and Gelbard, R. (2017). Knowledge sharing analytics: The case of IT workers. Journal of Computer Information Systems. DOI: 10.1080/ 08874417.2017.1360163.
Kozlowski, S.W.J., and Klein, K.J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. Klein and S. Kozlowski (eds), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kozlowski, S.W.J., Brown, K.G., and Weissbein, D.A. et al. (2011). A multilevel approach to training effectiveness: Enhancing horizontal and vertical transfer. In K.J. Klein and S.W.J. Kozlowski (eds), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (pp. 157–210). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kozlowski, S.W.J., Chao, G.T., and Morrison, R.F. (1998). Games raters play: Politics, strategies, and impression management in performance appraisal. In J.W. Smither (ed.), Performance Appraisal: State of the Art in Practice (pp.163–208). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kozlowski, S.W.J., Gully, S.M., Nason, E.R., and Smith, E.M. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In D. Ilgen and E. Pulakos (eds), The Changing Nature of Work and Performance: Implications for Staffing, Personnel Decisions, and Development (pp. 240–92). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kraiger, K., and Ford, J.K. (1985). A meta-analysis of race effects in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 56–65.
Landy, F.J. (2010). Performance ratings: Then and now. In J.L. Outz (ed.), Adverse Impact: Implications for Organizational Staffing and High Stakes Selection (pp.227–48). New York: Routledge.
Landy, F.J., and Farr, J.L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72–107.
Landy, F.J., and Farr, J.L. (1983). The Measurement of Work Performance. New York: Academic Press.
Latané, B., Williams, K., and Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–32.
Latham, G.P. (2017). What am I supposed to do in my job? Set goals and appraise your people. In N. Chmiel, F. Fraccaroli and M. Sverked (eds), An Introduction to Work and Organizational Psychology: An International Perspective (3rd edition) (pp. 64–79). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Latham, G.P., and Wexley, K.N. (1981). Increasing Productivity Through Performance Appraisal. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Latham, G.P., Almost, J., Mann, S., and Moore, C. (2005). New developments in performance management. Organizational Dynamics, 34(1), 77–87.
Latham, G.P., Fay, C.H., and Saari, L.M. (1979). The development of behavioral observation scales for appraising the performance of foremen. Personnel Psychology, 32, 299–311.
Latham, G.P., Ford, R.C., and Tzabbar, D. (2012). Enhancing employee and organizational performance through coaching based on mystery shopper feedback: A quasi experimental study. Human Resource Management, 51, 213–30.
Latham, G.P., Wexley, K.N., and Pursell, E.D. (1975). Training managers to minimize rating errors in the observation of behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(5), 550–55.
Lawler, E.E., Benson, G.S., and McDermott, M. (2012). Performance management and reward systems. World at Work Journal, 21, 19–28.
Lazarus, R.S. (1991). Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lepak, D.P., Liao, H., Chung, Y., and Harden, E.E. (2006). A conceptual review of human resource management systems in strategic human resource management research. In J.J. Martocchio (ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management (pp. 217–71). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Levinson, H. (2003). Management by whose objectives? Harvard Business Review, 81(1), 107–16.
Levy, H., and Sarnat, M. (1994). Capital Investment and Financial Decisions. London: Pearson Education.
Levy, P.E., and Williams, J.R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30(6), 881–905.
Leyerzapf, H., Abma, T.A., and Steenwijk et al. (2015). Standing out and moving up: Performance appraisal of cultural minority physicians. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20(4), 995–1010.
Li, X., Frenkel, S., and Sanders, K. (2011). How do perceptions of the HRM system affect employee attitudes? A multi-level study of Chinese employees. International Journal of HRM, 22, 1823–40.
Lievens, F., and Sanchez, J.I. (2007). Can training improve the quality of inferences made by raters in competency modeling? A quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 812–19.
Likert, R. (1961). New Patterns of Management. New York: McGraw Hill.
Litwin, G.H., and Stringer, R.A. (1968). Motivation and Organizational Climate. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Locke, E.A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 157–89.
Locke, E.A., and Latham, G.P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35 years odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705–17.
Locke, E.A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., and Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 241–51.
Lockwood, N.R. (2005). Workplace diversity: Leveraging the power of difference for competitive advantage. HR Magazine, 50(6), 1–10.
London, M., and Mone, E.M. (1999). Continuous learning. In D.R. Ilgen and E.D. Pulakos (eds), The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation and Development (pp. 119–53). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
London, M., and Wohlers, A.J. (1991). Agreement between subordinate and self-ratings in upward feedback. Personnel Psychology, 44(2), 375–90.
Longenecker, C.O., and Gioia, D.A. (1988). Neglected at the top – executives talk about executive appraisal. MIT Sloan Management Review, 29(2), 41–7.
Longenecker, C.O., Sims, H.P., and Gioia, D.A (1987). Behind the mask: The politics of employee appraisal. Academy of Management Executive, 1, 183–93.
Lord, R.G., and Smith, W.G. (1999). Leadership and the changing nature of performance. In D.R. Ilgen and E.D. Pulakos (eds), The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation and Development (pp.192–239). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lundstrom, J.T. (2007). A new use of frame-of-reference training: Improving reviewers’ inferences from biodata information. Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University.
Macfarlane, B., and Shah-Hosseini, S. (2014). Reimagining performance management: A failure of the dual purpose system and the innovative company’s way forward.Cornell University. Accessed February 4, 2018 at
Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Accessed February 4, 2018 at
Marks, M.A., De Church, L.A., and Mathieu, J.E. (2005). Teamwork in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 964–71.
Mathieu, J.E., and Zajac, D.M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171–94.
McClelland, D.C. (1965). Toward a theory of motive acquisition. American Psychologist, 20(5), 321–33.
McIntyre, R.M. (1986). The use of cognitive modeling as a method for training behavioral observation. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.
Meglino, B.M., Ravlin, E.C., and Adkins, C.L. (1989). A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 424–32.
Mercer (2013). Global Performance Management Survey Report: Executive Summary. Accessed January 4, 2018 at–BrochurePerfMgmt.pdf.
Meyer, H.H., Kay, E., and French Jr., J.R. (1965). Split roles in performance appraisal. Harvard Business Review, 43(1), 123–9.
Meyer, J.P., and Allen, N.J. (1984). Testing the ‘side-bet’ theory of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372–8.
Meyer, J.P., Allen, N.J., and Gellatly, I.R. (1990). Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time-lagged relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 710–20.
Meyer, M. (1998). Quality management: The essential component is teamwork. People Dynamics, 16, 30–35.
Miles, J.A., and Greenberg, J. (1993). Using punishment threats to attenuate social loafing effects among swimmers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 246–65.
Morgenson, F.P., and Hoffman, D.A (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 249–65.
Murphy, K.R. (2008). Explaining the weak relationship between job performance and ratings of job performance. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1(2), 148–60.
Murphy, K.R., and Balzer, W.K. (1989). Rater errors and rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 619–24.
Murphy, K.R., and Cleveland, J.N. (1995). Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational, and Goal-based Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Murphy, K.R., and DeNisi, A.S. (2008). A model of the appraisal process. In A.  Varma, P.S. Budhwar and A.S. DeNisi (eds), Performance Management Systems: A Global Perspective (pp. 81–96). London and New York: Routledge.
Murphy, K.R., Cleveland, J.N., and Mohler, C. (2001). Reliability, validity, and meaningfulness of multisource ratings. In D. Bracken, C. Timmreck, and A.  Church (eds), Handbook of Multisource Feedback (pp. 130–48). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Murphy, K.R., Cleveland, J.N., Skatlebo, A.L., and Kinney, T.B. (2004). Raters who pursue different goals give different ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 158–64.
Murphy, K.R., Jako, R.A., and Anhalt, R.L. (1993). The nature and consequence of halo error: A critical analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 218–25.
Nahm, A., Vonderembse, M., and Koufteros, X. (2003). The impact of organizational structure on time-based manufacturing and plant performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(3), 281–306.
Napier, N., and Latham, G.P. (1986). Outcome expectancies of people who conduct performance appraisals. Personnel Psychology, 39, 827–37.
Naquin, C.E., and Tynan, R.O. (2003). The team halo effect: Why teams are not blamed for their failures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 332–40.
Nathan, B.R., and Tippins, N. (1990). The consequences of halo ‘error’ in performance ratings: A field study of the moderating effects of halo on test validation results. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 290–96.
Nieminen, L.R.G., Rudolph, C.W., and Baltes, B.B. et al. (2013). The combined effects of contextual information and ratee bodyweight on performance judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(3), 527–43.
Nieva, V.F., and Gutek, B.A. (1980). Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 5, 267–76.
Kaplan, D.P., and Kaplan, R.S. (1996a). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
Kaplan, D.P., and Kaplan, R.S. (1996b). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75–85.
Ollander-Krane, R. (2015). Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? Symposium presentation, 30th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Philadelphia, PA.
O’Reilly, C.A. (1989). Corporations, culture, and commitment: Motivation and social control in organizations. California Management Review, 31, 9–25.
O’Reilly, C.A., Chatman, J., and Caldwell, D.F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person–organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487–516.
Ostroff, C., and Bowen, D.E. (2000). Moving HR to a higher level: HR practices and organizational effectiveness. In K. Klein and S. Kozlowski (eds), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (pp. 211–66). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Parmenter, D. (2015). Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing, and Using Winning KPIs. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Peasell, M.J., Christian, M.S., and Ellis, A.J. (2010). Motivating interdependent teams: Individual rewards, shared rewards, or something in between? Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 183–91.
Peretz, H., and Fried, Y. (2012). National cultures, performance appraisal practices, and organizational absenteeism and turnover: A study across 21 countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 448–59.
Perrow, C.A. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32, 194–208.
Phillips, J.M., Douthitt, E.A., and Hyland, M.M (2001). The role of justice in team member satisfaction with the leader and attachment to the team. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 316–25.
Pichler, S. (2012). The social context of performance appraisal and appraisal reactions: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Management, 51(5), 709–32.
Pichler, S. M., Beenen, G., and Wood, S. J. (2017). Feedback Frequency and Appraisal Reactions: A Meta-Analytic Test of Moderators. In  Academy of Management Proceedings, Academy of Management, 10366.
Ployhart, R.E., and Moliterno, T.P. (2011). Emergence of the human capital resource: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 127–50.
Poon, J.M. (2004). Effects of performance appraisal politics on job satisfaction and turnover intention. Personnel Review, 33(3), 322–34.
Porter, M.E., Kaplan, R.S., and Kahneman, D. (2018). HBR’s 10 Must Reads 2018: The Definitive Management Ideas of the Year from Harvard Business Review. Boston, MA: HBR.
Posthuma, R.A., Campion, M.C., and Campion, M.A. (2018).  A taxonomic foundation for evidence-based research on employee performance management. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27, 1–20.
Posthuma, R.A., Campion, M.C., Masimova, M., and Campion, M.A. (2013). A high performance work practices taxonomy: Integrating the literature and directing future research. Journal of Management, 39, 1184–220.
Price, K.H., Harrison, D.A., and Gavin, J.H. (2006). Withholding inputs in team contexts: Member composition, interaction processes, evaluation structure, and social loafing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1375–84.
Pritchard, R.D., and Karasick, B.W. (1973). The effects of organizational climate on managerial job performance and job satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9(1), 126–46.
Pulakos, E.D. (1984). A comparison of rater training programs: Error training and accuracy training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(4), 581–8.
Pulakos, E.D. (2009). Performance Management: A New Approach for Driving Business Results. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Pulakos, E.D., and O’Leary, R.S. (2011). Why is performance management broken? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(2), 146–64.
Pulakos, E.D., Mueller-Hanson, R., Arad, S., and Moye, N. (2015). Performance management can be fixed: An on-the-job experiential learning approach for complex behavior change. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 51–76.
Pulakos, E.D., Mueller-Hanson, R., O’Leary, R.S., and Meyrovitz, R.M. (2012). Practice Guidelines: Building a High-performance Culture: A Fresh Look at Performance Management. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management Foundation.
Pulakos, E.D., White, L.A., Oppler, S.H., and Borman, W.C. (1989). Examination of race and sex effects on performance rating. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 770–80.
Rabenu, E. (2017). Positive psychological capital: From strengths to power. In  V.  Muhlbauer and W. Harry (eds), Redefining Management: Toward Smart Power and the Liberation of Human Potential at Work (pp. 81–106). Cham: Springer.
Rabenu, E., and Tziner, A. (2016). Performance appraisal in a constantly changing work world. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(02), 370–77.
Rabenu, E., Tziner, A., and Sharoni, G. et al. (forthcoming). HR strength as a mediator or a moderator in the relationship between HR practices and organizational innovation? The Romanian study. Journal of East European Management Studies.
Rabl, T., Jayasinghe, M., Gerhart, B., and Kühlmann, T.M. (2014). A meta-analysis of country differences in the high-performance work system–business performance relationship: The roles of national culture and managerial discretion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1011–41.
Reilly, R.R., and Aronson, Z.H. (2009). Managing contextual performance. In J.W. Smither and M. London (eds), Performance Management: Putting Research into Practice (pp. 297–357), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Reilly, R.R., and McGourty, J. (1998). Performance appraisal in team settings. In J.W. Smither (ed.), Performance Appraisal: State of the Art in Practice (pp.244–77). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ribeiro, T.R., Coelho, J.P., and Gomes, J.F.S. (2011). HRM strength, situation strength and improvisation behavior. Journal of the American Academy of Management, 9(2), 118–36.
Riggs, M.L., Warka, J., and Babasa, B. et al. (1994). Development and validation of self-efficacy and outcome expectancy scales for job-related applications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 793–802.
Roch, S.G. (2015). Rating format and justice: Importance of justice dimension and trust. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of Society for Industrial and Organizational Society (SIOP), Philadelphia, PA.
Roch, S.G., Sternburgh, A., and Caputo, P. (2007). Absolute versus relative performance rating formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 302–16.
Roch, S.G., Woehr, D.J., Mishra, V., and Kieszczynska, U. (2012). Rater training revisited: An updated meta-analytic review of frame-of-reference training. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(2), 370–95.
Rock, D. (2008). SCARF: A brain-based model for collaborating with and influencing others. NeuroLeadership Journal, 1(1), 44–52.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the  attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 173–220.
Rusu, G., Avasilcăi, S., and Huţu, C.A. (2016). Organizational context factors influencing employee performance appraisal: A research framework. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221, 57–65.
Sackett, P.R., and DuBois, C.L.Z. (1991). Rater–ratee race effects on performance evaluation: Challenging meta-analysis conclusions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 873–8.
Sanders, K., Dorenbosch, L., and De Reuver, R. (2008). The impact of individual and shared employee perceptions of HRM on affective commitment considering climate strength. Personnel Review, 37(4), 412–25.
Sanders, K., Shipton, H. and Gomes, J.F.S. (2014). Guest editors’ introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current, and future challenges. Human Resource Management, 53, 489–503.
Sandlund, E., Olin-Scheller, C., and Nyroos, L. et al. (2011). The performance appraisal interview – an arena for the reinforcement of norms for employeeship. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 1(2), 59–75.
Schein, E.H. (1984). Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture. Sloan Management Review, 25(2), 3–16.
Schneider, B., Bowen, D.E., Ehrhart, M.G., and Holcombe, K.M. (2000). The climate for service: Evolution of a construct. In N.M. Ashkanasy, C.P. Wilderm, and M.F. Peterson (eds), Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate (pp.21–36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M.G., and Macey, W.H. (2011). Perspectives on organizational climate and culture. In S. Zedeck (ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 373–414). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M.G., and Macey, W.H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–88.
Scullen, S.E., Mount, M.K., and Goff, M. (2000). Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 956–70.
Seifert, C.F., Yukl, G., and McDonald, R.A. (2003). Effects of multisource feedback and feedback facilitation on the influence behavior of managers toward subordinates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 561–9.
Shaw, J.D., Jing, Z., and Duffy, M.K. (2011). A contingency model of conflict and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 391–400.
Shields, J., Brown, M., and Kaine, S. et al. (2015). Managing Employee Performance and Reward: Concepts, Practices, Strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Silverman, S.B., and Wexley, K.N. (1984). Reaction of employees to performance appraisal interviews as a function of their participation in rating scale development. Personnel Psychology, 37, 703–10.
Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 339–58.
Smith, B.N., Hornsby, J.S., and Shirmeyer, R. (1996). Current trends in performance appraisal: An examination of managerial practice. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 61(3), 10–16.
Smith, D.E. (1986). Training programs for performance appraisal: A review. Academy of Management Review, 11, 22–40.
Smith, P.C. and Kendall, L.M. (1963). Retranslation of expectation: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 149–55.
Smither, J.W., London, M., and Reilly, R.R. (2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 33–66.
Snyder, M. (1987). Public Appearances and Private Realities: The Psychology of Self-monitoring. New York: Freeman.
Spence, J.R., and Keeping, L.M. (2010). The impact of non-performance information on ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 587–608.
Spence, J.R., and Keeping, L.M. (2011). Conscious rating distortion in performance appraisal: A review, commentary, and proposed framework for research. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 85–95.
Stauffer, J.M. and Buckley, A.R. (2005). The existence and nature of racial bias in superior ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 586–91.
Steers, R.M., and Lee, T.W. (1983). Facilitating effective performance appraisals: The role of employee commitment and organizational climate. In F.  Landy, S.  Zedeck and J. Cleveland (eds), Performance Measurement and Theory (pp.75–88). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Steiner, D.D., Dobbins, G.H., and Trahan, W.A. (1991). The trainer–trainee interaction: An attributional model of training. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12(4), 271–86.
Sturm, R.E., and Antonakis, J. (2015). Interpersonal power: A review, critique, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41(1), 136–63.
Subramony, M. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between HRM bundles and firm performance. Human Resource Management, 48(5), 745–68.
Sulsky, L.M., and Balzer, W.K. (1988). The meaning and measurement of performance rating accuracy: Some methodological concerns. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 497–506.
Sumer, H.C., and Knight, P.A. (1996). Assimilation and contrast effects in performance ratings: Effects of rating the previous performance on rating subsequent performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 436–42.
Tannenbaum, S.I., Mathieu, J.E., Salas, E., and Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (1991). Meeting trainees’ expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 759–69.
Taylor, M.S., Tracy, K.B., and Renard, M.K. et al. (1995). Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 495–523.
Thurston, P.W. Jr., and McNall, L. (2010). Justice perceptions of performance appraisal practices. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(3), 201–28.
Tushman, M.L. (1977). A political approach to organizations: A review and rationale. Academy of Management Review, 2, 206–26.
Tyagi, P.K., and Wotruba, T.R. (1993). An exploratory study of reverse causality relationships among sales force turnover variables. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(2), 143–53.
Tziner, A. (1984). A fairer examination of rating scales when used for performance appraisal in a real organizational setting. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 5, 103–12.
Tziner, A. (1987). Congruency issue retested using Fineman’s achievement climate notion. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2(1), 63–78.
Tziner, A. (1990). Organization Staffing and Work Adjustment. New York: Praeger.
Tziner, A. (1999). The relationship between distal and proximal factors and the use of political considerations in appraisal. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14, 217–31.
Tziner, A. (2002). Human Resource Management and Organization Behavior: Selected Perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Tziner, A., and Dolan, S. (1984). The relationship of two sociodemographic variables and several perceived climate dimensions to performance. An investigation among real-estate agents. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 1(2), 272–87.
Tziner, A., and Latham, G.P. (1989). The effects of appraisal instrument, feedback and goal-setting on worker satisfaction and commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 145–153.
Tziner, A., and Murphy, K.R. (1999). Additional evidence of attitudinal influences  in performance appraisal. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13(3), 407–19.
Tziner, A., and Roch, S.G. (2016). Disappointing interventions and weak criteria: Carving out a solution is still possible. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(02), 350–56.
Tziner, A., Fein, E., and Birati, A. (2014). Tempering hard times: Integrating well-being metrics into utility analysis. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7, 554–68.
Tziner, A., Joanis, C., and Murphy, K. (2000). A comparison of three methods of performance appraisal with regard to goal properties, goal perception, and ratee satisfaction. Group and Organizational Management, 25, 175–90.
Tziner, A., Kopelman, R.E., and Joanis, C. (1997). Investigation of raters’ and ratees’ reactions to three methods of performance appraisal: BOS, BARS, and GRS. Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, 14, 396–404.
Tziner, A., Kopelman, R.E., and Livneh, N. (1993). Effects of performance appraisal format on perceived goal characteristics, appraisal process satisfaction, and changes in rated job performance: A field experiment. Journal of Psychology, 127, 282–92.
Tziner, A., Latham, G., Prince, B., and Haccoun, R.R. (1996). Development and validation of a questionnaire for measuring political considerations in performance appraisal. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 179–90.
Tziner, A., Murphy, K.R., and Cleveland, J.N. (2001). Relationship between attitudes toward organizations and performance appraisal systems and rating behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 226–39.
Tziner, A., Murphy, K.R., and Cleveland, J.N. (2002). Does conscientiousness moderate the relationship between attitudes and beliefs regarding performance appraisal and rating behavior? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(3), 218–24.
Tziner, A., Murphy, K.R., and Cleveland, J.N. (2005). Contextual and rater factors affecting rating behavior. Group and Organization Management, 30(1), 89–99.
Tziner, A., Murphy, K.R., and Cleveland et al. (1997). Impact of rater beliefs regarding performance appraisal and its organizational context on appraisal quality. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12, 457–46.
Tziner, A., Murphy, K., and Cleveland, J.N. et al. (2008). A new old question: Do contextual factors relate to rating behaviour? An investigation with peer evaluations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 59–67.
Tziner, A., Prince, B.S., and Murphy, K.R. (1997). PCPAQ: The questionnaire for measuring perceived political considerations in performance appraisal: Some new evidence regarding its psychometric qualities. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 189–99.
UC Berkeley (2018). Guide to Managing Human Resources. Accessed February 13, 2018 at
Vance, R.J., Winne, P.S., and Wright, S.E. (1983). A longitudinal examination of rater and rate effects in performance ratings. Personnel Psychology, 36, 609–20.
Varma, A., DeNisi, A.S., and Peters, L.H. (1996). Interpersonal affect and performance appraisal: A field study. Personnel Psychology, 49(2), 341–60.
Video Arts Ltd, UK (1977). How Am I Doing? Directed by Peter Robinson. Accessed February 15, 2018 at
Video Arts Ltd, UK (1990). The Dreaded Appraisal. Both Sides of the Appraisal Interview. Directed by Charles Crichton. Accessed February 14, 2018 at
Vigoda-Gadot, E., and Drory, A. (eds) (2017). Handbook of Organizational Politics: Looking Back and to the Future (2nd edition). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Villanova, P., Bernardin, H.J., Dahmus, S.A., and Sims, R.L. (1993). Rater leniency and performance appraisal discomfort. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 789–99.
Wagner, S.H., and Goffin, R.D. (1997). Differences in accuracy of absolute and comparative performance appraisal methods. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 95–103.
Wallace, S.R. (1965). Criteria for what? American Psychologist, 20, 411–17.
Wallston, B.S., and O’Leary, V.E. (1981). Sex makes a difference: Differential perceptions of women and men. In L. Wheeler (ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Vol. 2. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Wang, X., Wong, K., and Kwong, J.Y. (2010). The roles of rater goals and ratee performance levels in the distortion of performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 546–61.
Wei, L.Q., and Lau, C.M. (2010). High performance work systems and performance: The role of adaptive capability. Human Relations, 63(10), 1487–511.
Werner, J.M., and Bolino, M.C. (1997). Explaining US courts of appeal decisions involving performance appraisal: Accuracy, fairness and validation. Personnel Psychology, 50, 1–24.
Wexley, K.N., Sanders, R.E., and Yukl, G.A. (1973). Training interviewers to eliminate contrast effects in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 233–6.
Wexley, K.N., Singh, J.P., and Yukl, G.A. (1973). Subordinate personality as a moderator of the effects of participation in three types of appraisal interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58(1), 54–9.
Wheelan, S.A. (1994). Group Processes: A Developmental Perspective. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Wherry, R.J. (1973). An evaluative and diagnostic forced-choice rating scale for servicemen. Personnel Psychology, 12, 227–36.
Whitaker, A. (1992). The transformation in work: Post-Fordism revisited. In M. Reed and H. Hughes (eds), Rethinking Organization: New Directions in Organization Theory and Analysis. London: Sage.
Wiersma, U., and Latham, G.P. (1986). The practicality of behavioral observation scales, behavioral expectation scales, and trait scales. Personnel Psychology, 39(3), 619–28.
Wiggins, G.P. (2012). Seven keys to effective feedback. Feedback for Learning, 70(1), 10–16. Accessed February 12, 2018 at
Wikipedia (2018). Performance management. Accessed February 13, 2018 at
Wildman, J.L., Bedwell, W.L., Salas, E., and Smith-Jentsch, K.A. (2011). Performance measurement at work: A multilevel perspective. In S. Zedeck (ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1: Building and Developing the Organization (pp. 303–41). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Wilson, K.Y. (2010). An analysis of bias in supervisor narrative comments in performance appraisal. Human Relations, 63(12), 1903–33.
Woehr, D.J., and Huffcutt, A.I. (1994). Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(3), 189–205.
Woehr, D.J., and Roch, S.G. (1996). Context effects in performance evaluation: The impact of ratee sex and performance level on performance ratings and behavioral recall. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 31–42.
Wong, K., and Kwong, J.Y. (2007). Effects of rater goals on rating patterns: Evidence from an experimental field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 577–85.
Wood, R.E., and Marshall, V. (2008). Accuracy and effectiveness in appraisal outcomes: The influence of self-efficacy, personal factors and organizational variables. Human Resource Management Journal, 18(3), 295–313.
Woodward, J. (1965). Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yammarino, F.J., and Waldman, D.A. (1993). Performance in relation to job skill importance: A consideration of rater source. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 242–50.
Yasai-Adekani, M. (1986). Structural adaptations to environments. Academy of Management Review, 11, 9–21.
Youndt, M.A., Snell, S.A., Dean, J.W. Jr., and Lepak, D.P. (1996). Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 836–66.
Zohar, D., and Luria, G. (2004). Climate as a social-cognitive construct of supervisory safety practices: Scripts as proxy of behavior patterns. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 322–33.
*   We have cited extensively from this paper because it casts light on a particular facet of the debate on the present and the future state of performance appraisal that we intend to emphasize.