Competing and Co-Existing
Chapter 9: Comparing governance paradigms
This chapter compares the seven paradigms by using the public governance paradigm, discusses the relative positioning of the paradigms on the axes of the diamond and the distinct profile of the paradigms that appear as they are seen in an historical and developmental perspective. By applying the metaphor of the pendulum it indicates the succession of the paradigms as being antagonistic corrections to each other. Both political, functional and institutional explanations may serve to account for their historical appearance and for the dynamics of conflict and harmony in the evolution and coexistence of the paradigms. To a large extent the seven paradigms can be seen as competing for legitimacy in modernization programmes, but also as corrections in the evolution of public organization and management. A particular interest is paid to the discussion of the more or less explicit assumptions that each paradigm hold about human behaviour and from which central parts of the paradigms may be derived.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.