Bigger Pies and Just Deserts
Chapter 3: Why might inequality be necessary? Incentives, freedom, and efficiency
Some of the best and brightest minds in economics, philosophy, sociology, and history do not believe that inequality is necessarily something to worry about, and that a society in which equality is imposed on it by government is worse in every important aspect. Here, we examine different perspectives on inequality that contend that economic inequality is a necessary evil that should be accepted, not corrected. The views presented here argue that allowing markets to work optimizes efficiency and welfare by maximizing the size of the pie; allowing free choice ensures freedom; and that competition and a focus on meritocracy and “just deserts” promotes the virtues of hard work and entrepreneurship. In other words, inequality is not only efficient, it is also just. Focusing on attaining some abstract notion of “equality” will not only lead to a less efficient economy, it will also lead to a less fair society.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.