The Struggle for Social Impact and Public Legitimacy
Chapter 2: Policy permutations and the elusiveness of a fair system of accountability
This chapter provides a full introduction to the REF as the UK’s performance-based research funding system and considers recommendations established in a major government review focused on creating a fairer system of accountability. In so doing, the chapter explores the naivety and impotency of higher education policy in effecting positive change for the academic community and the persistence of forms of inequality spawned by the systematic manipulation by universities of research governance technologies. The theoretical perspectives of Frankfurt School luminaries Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer and Herbert Marcuse are adopted to illustrate the way in which the REF becomes analogous to a (high-stakes) game members of the higher education community in the UK love to hate, and a quasi-‘cultural industry’.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.