The Struggle for Social Impact and Public Legitimacy
Chapter 6: Recognizing competitive accountability
This chapter considers how the impact of academic research generated in UK universities is envisaged by what is alleged to be a major research user constituency – UK parliamentarians. Parliamentarians claim that the potential for academics to have an impact on Parliament is actually limited by their ability to engage with Parliament, which itself is contingent upon academic seniority, social capital, and an ability to complement and adapt to political agendas and the specific needs of policy-makers. The value attributed to university research as evidence that might inform parliamentary debate and decision-making is, furthermore, considered to be low and some way behind the influence of industry and business and those with greater (financial) capacity for political lobbying. Competitive accountability is thus seen, in the case of the parliamentarian as research user, to produce no more than an impact phantom.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.