Political Brands
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy
Abstract
Increasingly, commercial choices are taking on a political valence. Empirical evidence from polling confirms that customers are willing to end their patronage of businesses over corporate involvement in politics. In 2017, a poll by Ipsos showed that one-quarter of U.S. consumers claimed that they had boycotted a company for its political stance. Another survey of registered voters in 2017 found that half had reported participating in a boycott. Boycotting goes back to the Founding, when British tea and other taxed goods were boycotted by American colonists to protest taxation without representation. This American tradition was picked up by African Americans including Martin Luther King Jr., who urged customers to boycott Wonder Bread to make political points about social injustice. This chapter explains how the Supreme Court recognized that political boycotts are protected by the First Amendment. And finally, it examines boycotts (and buycotts) that target the Trump brand.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.