Responsibility for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Violations in UN Peace Operations
Chapter 7: General conclusions
Under public international law, aid or assistance in the commission of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes of jus cogens status is prohibited if such support would clearly and directly further the perpetration of atrocities and the assistance provider should have been aware of that. Proper implementation of the UN HRDDP will prevent UN responsibility for complicity. Immunity from suit and the absence of proper judicial mechanisms of enforcing international responsibility of IOs does not mean that the UN is unaccountable. Legitimacy of the organization and the future of UN peace operations depend on the UN’s reputation for complying with international law. Contemporary stabilization operations and other forms of strong allegiance with State parties to armed conflicts, such as MINUSMA operational and logistical support to the G5 Sahel Joint Force, carry a very high risk of the UN being exposed to allegations of complicity in international human rights law (IHRL) and international humanitarian law (IHL) violations.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.