Pension Reform and Economic Theory
Show Less

Pension Reform and Economic Theory

A Non-Orthodox Analysis

Sergio Cesaratto

The book is the first of its kind to attempt to deal with the economics of pensions and ageing on the basis of a rigorous theoretical framework alternative to neoclassical economics. Sergio Cesaratto breaks the dominant conformism in the current pension debate and explains that the strength of the various reforms proposed depends on the validity of the economic theories on which they are respectively based. He also illustrates the relevance of the Sraffian criticism to undermine the theoretical core of the mainstream proposals.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: The Conventional Interpretation of a Fully-Funded Scheme and Capital Theory

Sergio Cesaratto


* ‘Capital’ thus appears as past savings, which are, so to speak, ‘incorporated’ in the capital goods, existing at a given instant of time. As a result of the productive consumption of those goods, these past savings will periodically re-emerge in a ‘free’ form and can be re-incorporated in capital goods of the same or of different kinds; alternatively, they can be turned back into consumption. (Garegnani, 1983a, p. 33) 3.1 INTRODUCTION As we remember from Chapter 1, Samuelson (1958, p. 468) envisaged in capital accumulation a way to ‘trade with Mother Nature current consumption goods in return for future consumption goods’. Samuelson made explicit reference to neoclassical capital theory. Notably, Samuelson did not regard PAYG as detrimental to capital accumulation, a leitmotif nowadays. Historically, the Samuelsonian interpretation of PAYG was well suited to the post-World War II years of Keynesian policies of full employment, economic growth and expansion of the welfare state. The idea that welfare state institutions crowd out private capital accumulation was in retreat, and Samuelson could propose a rationalization of PAYG that tried to accommodate it within traditional economic theory. Later, well into the thick of the monetarist counter-revolution, Martin Feldstein (1974) criticized PAYG from the point of view of neoclassical theory. It was not by chance that, with reference to Samuelson’s contribution, Feldstein noted that ‘the assumption that there is no store of value or method of real accumulation is crucial’ (Feldstein, 1974, p. 923). Once the mechanism of capital accumulation proper to neoclassical theory is...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.