Edited by Michael J. Oliver and Derek H. Aldcroft
Chapter 8: The Demise of the Command Economies in the Soviet Union and its Outer Empire
1 Steven Morewood On 25 April 2005 Vladimir Putin, President of Russia, gave the annual address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, which had emerged from the former Soviet Union: Above all, we should acknowledge that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a major geopolitical disaster of the [twentieth] century. As for the Russian nation, it became a genuine drama. Tens of millions of our co-citizens and compatriots found themselves outside Russian territory. Moreover, the epidemic of disintegration infected Russia itself. Individual savings were depreciated, and old ideals destroyed. Many institutions were disbanded or reformed carelessly. Terrorist interventions and the Khasavyurt capitulation that followed damaged the country’s integrity. Oligarchic groups – possessing absolute control over information channels – served exclusively their own corporate interests. Mass poverty began to be seen as the norm. And all this was happening against the backdrop of a dramatic economic downturn, unstable ﬁnances, and the paralysis of the social sphere. Many thought or seemed to think at the time that our young democracy was not a continuation of Russian statehood, but its ultimate collapse, the prolonged agony of the Soviet system. (Putin 2005) Such nostalgia heralded an eﬀort to revive some elements of the Soviet monolith while paying lip service to democracy and capitalism. But there could be no reconstitution of the old system per se, no turning back to the old economic ways, centred on the command economy, which sowed the seeds of the disaster that engulfed the Soviet Union, bringing about...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.