Controlling Global Warming
Show Less

Controlling Global Warming

Perspectives from Economics, Game Theory and Public Choice

Edited by Christoph Böhringer, Michael Finus and Carsten Vogt

In this exhaustive study, the authors break new ground by integrating cutting edge insights on global warming from three different perspectives: game theory, cost-effectiveness analysis and public choice. For each perspective the authors provide an overview of important results, discuss the theoretical consistency of the models and assumptions, highlight the practical problems which are not yet captured by theory and explore the different applications to the various problems encountered in global warming. They demonstrate how each perspective has its own merits and weaknesses, and advocate an integrated approach as the best way forward. They also propose a research agenda for the future which encompasses the three methods to create a powerful tool for the analysis and resolution of global pollution problems.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Interest group preference for instruments of environmental policy: an overview

Jan-Tjeerd Boom


5 . Interest group preference for instruments of environmental policy: an overview Jan-Tjeerd Boom 1. INTRODUCTION In environmental politics, two things have to be decided: the level of abatement and the method of implementation. Economists have tried to shed light on both issues. The standard economic answer to the fust question is: one should abate up to the level where marginal social costs are equal to marginal social benefits. However, this answer is not always of much help, mainly because the marginal benefits are unknown. But economists have also taken up this challenge by trying to measure the value of what was previously immeasurable (see Hanemann 1994). So far, economists seem to have contributed more to answering the second question. Already more than a century ago, Sidgwick (1883) proposed using taxes to correct for negative externalities. This concept was later popularized by Pigou (1920), hence the name Pigouvian taxes. In the 1960s another instrument was added to the economist’s toolbox: tradable permits, a concept proposed by Crocker (1966) and Dales (1968a, 1968b) and formalized by Montgomery (1972). Since the rise of environmental policy in the 1960s and 1970s, economists have advocated, dare one say lobbied for, these instruments. Despite their efforts, not much has been gained. True, both taxes and tradable permit systems have been implemented (see Stavins 2000). However, taxes have often been set at such a low level that they have had no effect other than supplying government with revenue. Tradable permit systems are being used more and more,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.