Controlling Global Warming
Show Less

Controlling Global Warming

Perspectives from Economics, Game Theory and Public Choice

Edited by Christoph Böhringer, Michael Finus and Carsten Vogt

In this exhaustive study, the authors break new ground by integrating cutting edge insights on global warming from three different perspectives: game theory, cost-effectiveness analysis and public choice. For each perspective the authors provide an overview of important results, discuss the theoretical consistency of the models and assumptions, highlight the practical problems which are not yet captured by theory and explore the different applications to the various problems encountered in global warming. They demonstrate how each perspective has its own merits and weaknesses, and advocate an integrated approach as the best way forward. They also propose a research agenda for the future which encompasses the three methods to create a powerful tool for the analysis and resolution of global pollution problems.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: Conclusion

Christoph Böhringer and Carsten Vogt


Christoph Bohringer and Carsten Vogt Climate change due to anthropogenic greenhouse gases is one of the most challenging and complex environmental issues facing the world over the next century. Despite the uncertainty about the concrete impacts on the ecosystem, there is a broad consensus about the necessity for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in order to stabilize the climate system. However, the world community has been struggling for nearly a decade to agree on an effective international climate policy strategy. In this book, we have tried to shed some light from different perspectives of economic research on the problems involved in establishing an international agreement for controlling climate change. Chapter 2 adopted a game-theoretic approach to discuss incentive problems for sovereign states that prevent them from joining and complying with international environmental agreements (IEAs). Due to the pure public good nature of limiting GHG emissions, countries face two major free-rider incentives that are closely linked to each other. Firstly, countries may want to free ride by not signing any IEA at all or by joining a coalition that carries a lower abatement burden than other countries. Within the framework of reduced stage game (RSG) models, it was shown that, whenever cooperation would be most beneficial, the effective equilibrium coalition achieves only little in terms of abatement and overall welfare gains. Secondly, countries may want to free ride by not complying with the obligations of agreements. Building on the concept of renegotiation proofhess within repeated games, the way the design of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.