The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics
Show Less

The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics

Edited by Ross B. Emmett

Many know the Chicago School of Economics and its association with Milton Friedman, George Stigler, Ronald Coase and Gary Becker. But few know the School’s history and the full scope of its scholarship. In this Companion, leading scholars examine its history and key figures, as well as provide surveys of the School’s contributions to central aspects of economics, including: price theory, monetary theory, labor and economic history. The volume examines the School’s traditions of applied welfare theory and law and economics while providing a glimpse into emerging research on Chicago’s role in the development of neoliberalism.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Chicago Economics and Institutionalism

Malcolm Rutherford


Malcolm Rutherford* Introduction For most economists the terms ‘Chicago economics’ and ‘institutionalism’ denote clearly antithetical approaches to the discipline. Members of the modern ‘Chicago School’ such as George Stigler and Ronald Coase have often made highly dismissive remarks concerning American institutionalism. Coase has commented that American institutionalists were anti-theoretical, and that ‘without a theory they had nothing to pass on except a mass of descriptive material waiting for a theory, or a fire’ (Coase 1984, p. 230). Stigler devoted himself to fierce attacks on the work of Gardiner Means, John Kenneth Galbraith, Richard Lester, and of anyone else who ventured to question either the virtues of the free market or the empirical superiority of competitive price theory. Some of these attitudes have their roots in the interwar period, most obviously in Frank Knight’s views on the centrality of price theory to any properly ‘scientific’ economics (Knight 1924 [1999]), and in his bitingly critical attacks on the policy positions of institutionalist and other advocates of regulatory intervention and of the ‘social control’ of business (Knight 1932 [1999]). Nevertheless, what this chapter seeks to reveal is a much more complex interrelation between institutional and Chicago economics. To fully understand this relationship it is necessary to begin with the early years of the Chicago Department of Economics. Chicago economics and institutionalism, 1892–1919 The Chicago Department of Political Economy was begun in 1892 with Laurence Laughlin as its head. While Laughlin was conservative in his economic and political views, and at odds with...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.