The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics
Show Less

The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics

Edited by Ross B. Emmett

Many know the Chicago School of Economics and its association with Milton Friedman, George Stigler, Ronald Coase and Gary Becker. But few know the School’s history and the full scope of its scholarship. In this Companion, leading scholars examine its history and key figures, as well as provide surveys of the School’s contributions to central aspects of economics, including: price theory, monetary theory, labor and economic history. The volume examines the School’s traditions of applied welfare theory and law and economics while providing a glimpse into emerging research on Chicago’s role in the development of neoliberalism.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: On the Origins of A Monetary History

Hugh Rockoff


Hugh Rockoff* Introduction Milton Friedman and Anna J. Schwartz’s A Monetary History of the United States (1963a) is arguably the most important book in economics since The General Theory (Keynes 1936).1 It has inspired and informed an enormous amount of research. Even footnotes have produced voluminous and contentious literatures.2 This chapter explores some of the work that influenced the Monetary History.3 It shows that the ideas of several Chicago economists – Henry Schultz, Henry Simons, Lloyd Mints and Jacob Viner – left clear marks. However, it argues that the most important influence may have been Wesley Clair Mitchell and his classic book Business Cycles (1913). Mitchell, and the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER or the Bureau), provided the methodology, in particular the emphasis on long accurate time series of monthly data and the analysis of the effects of specific variables on the business cycle. Mitchell’s book, as I try to show below, contained a preliminary exploration of the issues examined in more detail, and for a longer historical period, in the Monetary History. Mitchell concluded that money played an independent, predictable and important role in shaping the business cycle. Friedman and Schwartz’s work, although it differed on several particulars, most importantly on the role of bank-lending policies in the transmission of monetary impulses, strongly reinforced Mitchell’s basic conclusions. Perhaps the most important reason for exploring the origins of the Monetary History is that it facilitates understanding. Although the Monetary History is enormously influential, and although its analyses of particular events...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.