The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics
Show Less

The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics

  • Elgar original reference

Edited by Ross B. Emmett

Many know the Chicago School of Economics and its association with Milton Friedman, George Stigler, Ronald Coase and Gary Becker. But few know the School’s history and the full scope of its scholarship. In this Companion, leading scholars examine its history and key figures, as well as provide surveys of the School’s contributions to central aspects of economics, including: price theory, monetary theory, labor and economic history. The volume examines the School’s traditions of applied welfare theory and law and economics while providing a glimpse into emerging research on Chicago’s role in the development of neoliberalism.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 11: Chicago Law and Economics

Steven G. Medema

Extract

11 Chicago law and economics Steven G. Medema* Introduction The field of law and economics is arguably the most successful of economics’ various imperialistic movements, and this success has been driven largely by scholars from the University of Chicago and their protégés. If one spends much time examining the current literature in the field, including ‘surveys’ of law and economics and its development, one comes away with the distinct impression that the field is a post-1960 phenomenon, one that dates roughly from the founding of the Journal of Law & Economics (JL&E) in the late 1950s and the publication of Ronald Coase’s (1960) ‘The problem of social cost’. In fact, of course, law and economics, conceived of as the study of the interrelations between legal and economic processes, is as old as economics itself. The ancient Greeks, the scholastics, Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Henry Sidgwick, the German Historical School, A.C. Pigou, and, inter alia, the early American institutionalists devoted significant attention to legal–economic relationships. Yet, the existence of this literature is noted only barely, if at all, in contemporary legal–economic scholarship, and, when taken note of, it is largely waved aside as something very different from (and irrelevant for) contemporary analysis. The first four decades of the twentieth century witnessed a surge of interest in law and economics within both the legal and economics communities, and the vast majority of this scholarship was of a form very different from that of contemporary law and economics – not...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.