The Elgar Companion To Economics and Philosophy
Show Less

The Elgar Companion To Economics and Philosophy

  • Elgar original reference

Edited by John B. Davis, Alain Marciano and Jochen Runde

The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy aims to demonstrate exactly how these two important areas have always been linked, and to illustrate the key areas of overlap. The contributors are well-known and distinguished authors from a variety of disciplines, who have been invited both to survey and to provide a personal assessment of current and prospective future states of their respective areas of philosophical interest.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes

Roger E. Backhouse


9 The methodology of scientific research programmes Roger E. Backhouse MSRP and economic methodology Economic methodology emerged as an identifiable field at the boundaries of economics and philosophy in the early 1980s. Lakatos’s methodology of scientific research programmes (MSRP) played an important role in this process. Method and Appraisal in Economics (Latsis 1976), edited by one of Lakatos’s students, contained detailed case studies in which the MSRP was applied to economics. Partly because the contributors included distinguished economists (John Hicks, Herbert Simon and Axel Leijonhufvud) as well as established historians of economic thought (Terence Hutchison, Mark Blaug, Bob Coats, Neil de Marchi) this book obtained a wide readership. It encouraged younger scholars (such as Bruce Caldwell) to take methodology seriously. Shortly afterwards, Mark Blaug’s Methodology of Economics (1980 [1992]), dominated by Popperian and Lakatosian philosophy, provided a survey of the field, a textbook and a provocative thesis about economics: it became the standard target at which those wanting to make a name for themselves could and did take aim. During the 1980s, it is arguable that the MSRP provided the dominant approach to economic methodology. There were several reasons why the MSRP proved attractive to those turning to economic methodology. It held out the hope of providing a rigorous conceptual framework within which to analyse episodes in the history of economics (many of those who turned to it were historians). Its combination of history with appraisal seemed superior to Thomas Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1970)...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.