A Handbook of Economic Anthropology
Show Less

A Handbook of Economic Anthropology

Edited by James G. Carrier

This unique Handbook contains substantial and invaluable summary discussions of work on economic processes and issues, and on the relationship between economic and non-economic areas of life. Furthermore it describes conceptual orientations that are important among economic anthropologists, and presents summaries of key issues in the anthropological study of economic life in different regions of the world. Its scope and accessibility make it useful both to those who are interested in a particular topic and to those who want to see the breadth and fruitfulness of an anthropological study of economics.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 20: Gender

Maila Stivens


Maila Stivens Anthropology has much to offer the study of the economic, feminist anthropology especially so. Gender is a key social relation shaping the material flows of production, consumption and exchange, and is in turn shaped by those flows. But making economic anthropology more sensitive to gender issues has proved something of a challenge. With the growing consciousness in the 1970s of the importance of gender in understanding societies, feminist anthropologists soon realised more was required than simply ‘adding women to existing paradigms and stirring’. Instead, we needed to recast the models used to think about the place of gender, not simply women, within economic anthropology. It soon became clear, however, that anthropology as a whole had a problem with talking about ‘women’ and ‘gender’. As Moore (1988) notes, it was not so much that women were absent from analyses: many of the classic texts of anthropology in fact provided much material about women’s activities, including their activities in economic spheres. It was more the ways in which they were written about and the importance granted in analyses to gender as a social construct. The available frameworks within anthropology to think about gender in relation to economic activities have been part of the problem, especially the notions of the ‘economic’ and the ‘domestic’. A serious rethinking from a gendered perspective of the concepts employed in talking about the range of ‘economies’ typically studied by anthropologists was required. This rethinking was further complicated by the unfolding crisis in anthropology in the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.