Handbook of Knowledge and Economics
Show Less

Handbook of Knowledge and Economics

  • Elgar original reference

Edited by Richard Arena, Agnès Festré and Nathalie Lazaric

By illuminating the philosophical roots of the various notions of knowledge employed by economists, this Handbook helps to disentangle conceptual and typological issues surrounding the debate on knowledge amongst economists. Wide-ranging in scope, it explores fundamental aspects of the relationship between knowledge and economics – such as the nature of knowledge, knowledge acquisition and knowledge diffusion.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 16: Knowledge and its Economic Characteristics: A Conceptual Clarification

Ulrich Witt, Tom Broekel and Thomas Brenner


16 Knowledge and its economic characteristics: a conceptual clarification Ulrich Witt, Tom Broekel and Thomas Brenner 16.1 INTRODUCTION It is broadly acknowledged now that knowledge plays a crucial role in understanding technological change and its impact on economic activities (cf., e.g., Feldman, 1994; Nonaka et al., 2000; Antonelli, 2001; Mokyr, 2002; Murmann, 2003). With a growing body of research in economics focusing on the role of knowledge, a growing number of concepts and classifications of knowledge has been developed since the first elaborate attempt in that direction by Machlup (1980). One distinction that, among others, will serve as a reference here goes back to Polanyi (1958). It is the widely used distinction between tacit and overt, or implicit and explicit, knowledge (see Cowan and Foray, 1997; Cowan et al., 2000 and the literature cited there). While knowledge is considered overt when it is openly accessible to everybody and understandable, for tacit knowledge this is considered not to be the case (Cowan and Foray, 1997; Zack, 1999; Cowan et al., 2000; Lissoni, 2001). A distinction like this is made with the intention to bring out characteristics of knowledge that are regarded as significant. Yet, what the significant characteristics are depends on the context. Distinguishing tacit from overt knowledge does not seem of much help, for instance, in deciding whether or not knowledge has a public-good character – a question that figures prominently in the economic literature (e.g. in welfare theory; see Arrow, 1962, or new growth theory; see Langlois, 2001). Some authors...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.