Analysing Strategic Environmental Assessment
Show Less

Analysing Strategic Environmental Assessment

Towards Better Decision-Making

Edited by Pietro Caratti, Holger Dalkmann and Rodrigo Jiliberto

Analytical Strategic Environmental Assessment (ANSEA) is an insightful new approach to environmental evaluation, based on decision theory, policy analysis and environmental considerations. These concepts, though not new in their own fields of application, are combined and integrated in an innovative fashion. This book presents recent research on the implementation of the ANSEA approach which aims to ensure environmental values are properly integrated into the decision-making process.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 1: Background and context of a strategic environmental assessment

Gary Haq


Gary Haq 1.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter aims to provide the background and context to the ANSEA project. It reviews the evolution and development of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) from project environmental impact assessment (EIA). It examines the definitions of environmental assessment (EA) and its limitations and identifies a need to develop a new conceptual framework for SEA based on the systematic integration of environmental values in the decision-making process. 1.2 EVOLUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND NEED FOR SEA The 1969 US National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) introduced the first EIA system as a result of the convergence of several factors. These included (O’Riordan and Sewell 1981): a tradition of rational planning; a new level of public concern about the environment; the increasing scale and wider repercussions of major development schemes; and the failure of project appraisal and review procedures to account for evident ecological and community impacts. Since its introduction, different EIA systems have been set up worldwide and have enabled EIA to become an important tool to safeguard the environment in the project planning process (Morris and Therivel 1995; Petts 1999). EIA procedural and methodological developments have reinforced each other and have resulted in a shift towards broader and more integrative assessments. In particular, the EIA process has taken a stronger socio-political dimension while its scientificrational basis has become methodologically diverse and specialized (Sadler 1996). Three main trends in the evolution of EIA can be identified: 5 6 ANSEA theoretical background 1. adoption of EIA worldwide since its...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.