Leading Issues in Competition, Regulation and Development
Show Less

Leading Issues in Competition, Regulation and Development

Edited by Paul Cook, Colin Kirkpatrick, Martin Minogue and David Parker

The book draws together contributions from leading experts across a range of disciplines including economics, law, politics and governance, public management and business management. The authors begin with an extensive overview of the issues of regulation and competition in developing countries, and carefully illustrate the important themes and concepts involved. Using a variety of country and sector case studies, they move on to focus on the problems of applicability and adaptation that are experienced in the process of transferring best practice policy models from developed to developing countries. The book presents a clear agenda for further empirical research and is notable for its rigorous exploration of the links between theory and practice.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 18: The political economy of privatization in Malaysia

Tan Wooi Syn


Tan Wooi Syn INTRODUCTION The state is central to the design and implementation of privatization as it must identify the industry or sector, select candidates, and regulate performance, particularly if monopolies are involved. State support is also necessary where the private sector is unable to bear all the risks in large projects such as infrastructure development that involve externalities. However, such state intervention can undermine private incentives and reduce efficiency. The success of privatization then depends on a country’s institutional endowments, in particular its regulatory capacity, and the quality of information available. This chapter considers these issues in the case of Malaysia, where financial difficulties leading to state bailouts and renationalizations highlight the problems of patronage closely associated with its privatization programme. Poor privatization design, selection and regulation arguably led to inappropriate choices of privatizations and candidates, and weakened incentives to increase efficiency and investment. This in turn emphasizes institutional criteria for the success of privatization policies. Why the government proceeded despite these problems, and why poor institutions were allowed to persist, demands examination of the political factors that shaped privatization policies and institutions. Privatization was part of a redistributive process that sought to develop entrepreneurial capacity by promoting capital accumulation. But this process also undermined ‘learning’, compromising the quality of candidates, and increasing patronage. Growing factional rivalries within the ruling Malay party led to centralized decision making and weakened institutions, resulting in poor choices. Despite its authority, the government was unable to ensure service delivery. This suggests that while...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.