Public Goods, Redistribution and Rent Seeking
Show Less

Public Goods, Redistribution and Rent Seeking

Gordon Tullock

Gordon Tullock, eminent political economist and one of the founders of public choice, offers this new and fascinating look at how governments and externalities are linked. Economists frequently justify government as dealing with externalities, defined as benefits or costs that are generated as the result of an economic activity, but that do not accrue directly to those involved in the activity. In this original work, Gordon Tullock posits that government can also create externalities. In doing so, he looks at governmental activity that internalizes such externalities.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Rent Seeking

Gordon Tullock


In the last chapter we noticed that transfers of income to do not always go to the poor. In fact most of them do not. The externality inflicted by people who are in trouble may lead to our granting them funds or other assistance. But the amount we give cannot be explained solely by that particular externality. There is another explanation, which is simply that people use their votes or other political means to obtain transfers to themselves. This is not simple and requires looking into a relatively new field in economics, ‘rent seeking’. Since I was the one who first discovered rent seeking, although not the title, which was introduced by Ann Krueger (1974), I am in a particularly good position to explain this. I will start with a simple straightforward explanation of what I might call the traditional view of rent seeking and then make some modifications, which are necessary for our current problem. Traditional economics textbooks explained monopolies with a figure like my Figure 9.1. There is a competitive price and the monopoly raises the price to the monopoly price shown on the figure. Traditionally the shaded triangle, A, C, B which shows the consumer surplus lost by people who would have purchased a product under the previous price and do not with the higher price. The rectangle between the competitive price and the monopoly price D, E, C, A shows the transfer of revenue from the purchasers to the monopolist. The traditional reasoning found...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.